Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35151117›Full record

ArticleEnvironment international2022

A computational system for Bayesian benchmark dose estimation of genomic data in BBMD.

Chao Ji, Andrew Weissmann, Kan Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao JiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Andrew WeissmannDREAM Tech, LLC, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA.
Kan ShaoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: kshao@indiana.edu.

Funding

Develop and Commercialize the Bayesian Dose-Response Modeling System and ServicesR42ES032642 · NIEHS · KS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC · PI SHAO, KAN · 2020 to 2021
$2.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R42 ES032642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting studies have revealed that the benchmark dose (BMD) estimates from short-term in vivo transcriptomics studies can approximate those from long-term guideline toxicity assessments. Existing software applications follow this trend by analyzing omics data through the maximum likelihood estimation and choosing the "best" model for BMD estimates. However, this practice ignores the model uncertainty and may result in over-confident inferences and predictions, leading to an inadequate decision.

objectiveBy generally following the National Toxicology Program Approach to Genomic Dose-Response Modeling, we developed a web-based dose-response modeling and BMD estimation system, Bayesian BMD (BBMD), for genomic data to quantitatively address uncertainty from various sources. The performances of BBMD are compared with BMDExpress.

methodsThe system is primarily based on the previously developed BBMD system and further developed in a genomic perspective. Bayesian model averaging method is applied to BMD estimation and pathways analyses. Generally, the system is unique regarding the flexibility in preparing/storing data and in characterizing uncertainties.

resultsThis system was tested and validated versus 24 previously published in-vivo microarray dose-response datasets (GSE45892) and 64 molecules data from the Open TG-Gates database. Short term transcriptional BMD values for the median pathway in BBMD are highly correlated with the long-term apical BMD values (R = 0.78-0.91). The BMD estimates obtained by BBMD were compared to those by BMDExpress. The results indicate that BBMD provides more adequate results in terms of less extreme values and no failure in BMD and BMDL calculations. Also, the pathway analysis in BBMD provides a conservative estimate because a broader confidence interval is established. DISCUSSION: Overall, this study demonstrates that dose-response modeling using genomic data can play a substantial role in support of chemical risk assessment. BBMD represents a robust and user-friendly alternative for genomic dose-response data analysis with outstanding functionalities to quantify uncertainty from various sources.

Indexed as

GenomicsBayes TheoremDose-Response Relationship, DrugNitrilesRisk Assessmentalpha-benzyl-alpha-bromomalodinitrileNitrilesBayesianBBMDBenchmark doseGenomic data

Identifiers

PMID35151117
PMCPMC8934139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.