Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150621›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Planetary health2022

Effect of a low-cost, behaviour-change intervention on latrine use and safe disposal of child faeces in rural Odisha, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Bethany A Caruso, Gloria D Sclar, Parimita Routray, Corey L Nagel, Fiona Majorin, Steven Sola, William J Koehne, Thomas Clasen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03274245 (Implementing and Evaluating a Multi-Level Intervention to Increase Latrine Use and Safe Feces Disposal Among Latrine Owning Households in Rural Puri District, Odisha, India), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03274245 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing and Evaluating a Multi-Level Intervention to Increase Latrine Use and Safe Feces Disposal Among Latrine Owning Households in Rural Puri District, Odisha, India

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled11,722ConditionsLatrine UsageArmsIntervention Package, Qualitative Research
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social competition drives collective action to reduce informal waste burning in Uganda.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Positive Deviance Approach on Promotion of Safe Disposal of Child's Feces in Rural Tamil Nadu: A Community-Based Quasi-Experimental Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bethany A CarusoHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: bcaruso@emory.edu.
Gloria D SclarGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Parimita RoutrayIndependent Consultant, Bhubaneswar, India.
Corey L NagelCollege of Nursing, and College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Fiona MajorinDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Steven SolaGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William J KoehneDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Thomas ClasenGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake of Government-promoted sanitation remains a challenge in India. We aimed to investigate a low-cost, theory-driven, behavioural intervention designed to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child faeces in India.

methodsWe did a cluster-randomised controlled trial between Jan 30, 2018, and Feb 18, 2019, in 66 rural villages in Puri, Odisha, India. Villages were eligible if not adjacent to another included village and not designated by the Government to be open-defecation free. All latrine-owning households in selected villages were eligible. We assigned 33 villages to the intervention via stratified randomisation. The intervention was required to meet a limit of US$20 per household and included a folk performance, transect walk, community meeting, recognition banners, community wall painting, mothers' meetings, household visits, and latrine repairs. Control villages received no intervention. Neither participants nor field assessors were masked to study group assignment. We estimated intervention effects on reported latrine use and safe disposal of child faeces 4 months after completion of the intervention delivery using a difference-in-differences analysis and stratified results by sex. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03274245.

findingsWe enrolled 3723 households (1807 [48·5%] in the intervention group and 1916 [51·5%] in the control group). Analysis included 14 181 individuals (6921 [48·8%] in the intervention group and 7260 [51·2%] in the control group). We found an increase of 6·4 percentage points (95% CI 2·0-10·7) in latrine use and an increase of 15·2 percentage points (7·9-22·5) in safe disposal of child faeces. No adverse events were reported.

interpretationA low-cost behavioural intervention achieved modest increases in latrine use and marked increases in safe disposal of child faeces in the short term but was unlikely to reduce exposure to faecal pathogens to a level necessary to achieve health gains.

fundingThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.

Indexed as

SanitationToilet FacilitiesChildFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleHumansRural Population

Identifiers

PMID35150621
PMCPMC8850376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.