Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150575›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Whole genome sequence analyses-based assessment of virulence potential and antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial swine and cattle probiotic products.

Pragathi B Shridhar, Raghavendra G Amachawadi, Mike Tokach, Isha Patel, Jayanthi Gangiredla, Mark Mammel, T G Nagaraja

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Marine-DerivedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic diversity and distinction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Stability ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Supplementation of direct-fed microbialJDS communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proteomic Characterization of Virulence Factors and Related Proteins inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pragathi B ShridharDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5800, USA.
Raghavendra G AmachawadiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5800, USA.
Mike TokachDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5800, USA.
Isha PatelDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Jayanthi GangiredlaDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Mark MammelDivision of Molecular Biology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, United States Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
T G NagarajaDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5800, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0899-878X
Kansas State University · USCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococcus faecium is one of the more commonly used bacterial species as a probiotic in animals. The organism, a common inhabitant of the gut of animals and humans, is a major nosocomial pathogen responsible for a variety infections in humans and sporadic infections in animals. In swine and cattle, E. faecium-based probiotic products are used for growth promotion and gut functional and health benefits. The objective of this study was to utilize whole genome sequence-based analysis to assess virulence potential, detect antimicrobial resistance genes, and analyze phylogenetic relationships of E. faecium strains from commercial swine and cattle probiotics. Genomic DNA extracted from E. faecium strains, isolated from commercial probiotic products of swine (n = 9) and cattle (n = 13), were sequenced in an Illumina MiSeq platform and analyzed. Seven of the nine swine strains and seven of the 13 cattle strains were identified as Enterococcus lactis, and not as E. faecium. None of the 22 probiotic strains carried major virulence genes required to initiate infections, but many carried genes involved in adhesion to host cells, which may benefit the probiotic strains to colonize and persist in the gut. Strains also carried genes encoding resistance to a few medically important antibiotics, which included aminoglycosides [aac(6')-Ii, aph(3')-III, ant(6)-Ia], macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B (msrC), tetracyclines [tet(L) and tet(M)], and phenicols [cat-(pc194)]. The comparison of the genotypic to phentypic AMR data showed presence of both related and unrelated genes in the probiotic strains. Swine and cattle probiotic E. faecium strains belonged to diverse sequence types. Phylogenetic analysis of the probiotic strains, and strains of human (n = 29), swine (n = 4), and cattle (n = 4) origin, downloaded from GenBank, indicated close clustering of strains belonging to the same species and source, but a few swine and cattle probiotic strains clustered closely with other cattle and human fecal strains. In conclusion, the absence of major virulence genes characteristic of the clinical E. faecium strains suggests that these probiotic strains are unlikely to initiate opportunistic infection. However, the carriage of AMR genes to medically important antibiotics and close clustering of the probiotic strains with other human and cattle fecal strains suggests that probiotic strains may pose risk to serve as a source of transmitting AMR genes to other gut bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsEnterococcus faeciumProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenySequence AnalysisSwineVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistance genescattleEnterococcus faeciumprobioticsswinevirulence geneswhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35150575
PMCPMC8908542
OpenAlexW4211204050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.