Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150380›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

Epidemiology and outcome of occult bacteremia in patients discharged from emergency departments or ambulatory units: one-year study.

Fanny Andry, Marion Le Maréchal, Isabelle Pierre, Christine Recule, Yvan Caspar, Caroline Landelle, Olivier Epaulard, Patricia Pavese

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fanny AndryInfectious Diseases Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France. fanny.andry@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6343-5130
Marion Le MaréchalInfectious Diseases Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Isabelle PierreInfectious Diseases Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Christine ReculeLaboratory of Bacteriology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Yvan CasparLaboratory of Bacteriology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Caroline LandelleInfection Control Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University/CNRS, Grenoble INP, MESP TIM-C UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.
Olivier EpaulardInfectious Diseases Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Patricia PaveseInfectious Diseases Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is made several hours after blood culture sampling. This delay could be critical in ambulatory clinics, emergency departments, and hospital day care units, as the patient may be discharged prior to blood culture positivity. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome (including the number of readmissions) of patients diagnosed with BSI after discharge. We prospectively included all adult patients with positive blood culture for BSI that was confirmed after discharge from our center (Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital) in 2016. Patients were contacted about their blood culture results, and their clinical status was controlled via an external consultation or their family physician, with hospital readmission if necessary. Clinical outcome, accuracy of initial diagnosis, microbiological epidemiology, and antibiotic prescription were assessed. In 2016, 1433 episodes of positive blood culture were detected in our hospital, with 50 (3.5%) occurring after patient discharge. Clinically relevant bacteria were determined in 32/50 cases (64%), while other positive blood culture results were considered to be contaminants. Clinical reevaluation was performed in 45 patients (90%). The diagnosis was changed during the clinical reassessment of 24/49 patients (49%). Antibiotics were prescribed prior to discharge for 24/50 patients (48%), modified during follow-up for 15/45 (33%), and initiated for 13/45 (29%) at the reevaluation. Overall, 24/45 (53%) patients were readmitted to hospital units after reevaluation. The clinical follow-up of patients with positive blood culture after discharge led to diagnostic changes and hospital readmission in around half of patients.

Indexed as

BacteremiaPatient DischargeAdultBlood CultureEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesAmbulatory medicineAntibiotic stewardshipBacteremiaBlood cultureBloodstream infection

Identifiers

PMID35150380
OpenAlexW4211149283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.