Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150348›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2022

Cell cycle arrest biomarkers for predicting renal recovery from acute kidney injury: a prospective validation study.

Hui-Miao Jia, Li Cheng, Yi-Bing Weng, Jing-Yi Wang, Xi Zheng, Yi-Jia Jiang, Xin Xin, Shu-Yan Guo, Chao-Dong Chen, Fang-Xing Guo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury.Annals of intensive care · 2024
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hui-Miao JiaDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Li ChengDepartment of Emergent Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Lu-He Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Yi-Bing WengDepartment of Emergent Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Lu-He Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101100, China.
Jing-Yi WangDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xi ZhengDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yi-Jia JiangDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xin XinDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Shu-Yan GuoDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Chao-Dong ChenDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Fang-Xing GuoDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Yu-Zhen HanDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
Tian-En Zhang, Gettysburg, PA, 17325, USA.
Wen-Xiong LiDepartment of Surgical Intensive Critical Unit, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China. liwx1126@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z181100001718204Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z191100006619032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). AKI patients with nonrecovery of renal function have a markedly increased risk of death compared with patients with recovery. The current study aimed to explore and validate the utility of urinary cell cycle arrest biomarkers for predicting nonrecovery in patients who developed AKI after ICU admission.

methodsWe prospectively and consecutively enrolled 379 critically ill patients who developed AKI after admission to the ICU, which were divided into a derivation cohort (194 AKI patients) and a validation cohort (185 AKI patients). The biomarkers of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) were detected at inclusion immediately after AKI diagnosis (day 0) and 24 h later (day 1). The optimal cut-off values of these biomarkers for predicting nonrecovery were estimated in the derivation cohort, and their predictive accuracy was assessed in the validation cohort. The primary endpoint was nonrecovery from AKI (within 7 days).

resultsOf 379 patients, 159 (41.9%) patients failed to recover from AKI onset, with 79 in the derivation cohort and 80 in the validation cohort. Urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] on day 0 showed a better prediction ability for nonrecovery than TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 alone, with an area under the reciever operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.751 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.701-0.852, p < 0.001] and an optimal cut-off value of 1.05 ((ng/mL)

conclusionUrinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] on day 0 showed a fair performance for predicting nonrecovery from AKI. The predictive accuracy can be improved when urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] is combined with the clinical factors of AKI diagnosed by the UO criteria, AKI stage 2-3 and nonrenal SOFA score.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryIGFBP7PrognosisRenal recoveryTIMP-2

Identifiers

PMID35150348
PMCPMC8840946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.