ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2022
Glioblastoma recurrent cells switch between ATM and ATR pathway as an alternative strategy to survive radiation stress.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- ATR inhibition using gartisertib enhances cell death and synergises with temozolomide and radiation in patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines.Oncotarget · 2024Article
- Targeting the DNA Damage Response Machinery for Lung Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Primary treatment modality for glioblastoma (GBM) post-surgery is radiation therapy. Due to increased DNA damage repair capacity of resistant residual GBM cells, recurrence is inevitable in glioblastoma and unfortunately the recurrent tumours are resistant to the conventional therapy. Here we used our previously described in vitro radiation survival model generated from primary GBM patient samples and cell lines, which recapitulates the clinical scenario of therapy resistance and relapse. Using the parent and recurrent GBM cells from these models, we show that similar to parent GBM, the recurrent GBM cells also elicit a competent DNA damage response (DDR) post irradiation. However, the use of apical DNA damage repair sensory kinase (ATM and/or ATR) is different in the recurrent cells compared to parent cells. Consistently, we demonstrate that there is a differential clonogenic response of parent and recurrent GBM cells to the ATM and ATR kinase inhibitors with recurrent samples switching between these sensory kinases for survival emphasizing on the underlying heterogeneity within and across GBM samples. Taken together, here we report that recurrent tumours utilize an alternate DDR kinase to overcome radiation induced DNA damage. Since there is no effective treatment specifically for recurred GBM patients, these findings provide a rationale for developing newer treatment option to sensitize recurrent GBM samples by detecting in clinics the ability of cells to activate a DNA damage repair kinase different from their parent counterparts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.