Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150297›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Anastomosis technique and leakage rates in minimally invasive surgery for right-sided colon cancer. A retrospective national cohort study.

Helene Juul Würtz, Lars Bundgaard, Hans B Rahr, Erik Frostberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. IsoperistalticWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  4. Ileocolic Anastomoses.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helene Juul WürtzDepartment of Surgery, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. helene.juul.wurtz3@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-0084
Lars BundgaardDepartment of Surgery, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-121X
Hans B RahrDepartment of Surgery, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4571-7852
Erik FrostbergDepartment of Surgery, Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-0365
Vejle Sygehus · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to describe the different techniques currently used in Denmark to construct right-sided ileocolic anastomoses in minimally invasive surgery, and investigate, compare and analyse the anastomotic configurations and their anastomotic leakage (AL) rates.

methodsThis was a retrospective register-based, study design using prospectively collected data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database. All patients aged 18 years or older with a malignant colorectal tumour in Denmark in the period of 1 February 2015 until 31 December 2019, and who had an elective, curative, minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) with ileocolic anastomosis, were included.

resultsThree thousand three hundred ninety-eight patients were included. The most commonly used anastomotic approach was the extracorporeal (EC) hand-sewn anastomosis (HA) with end-to-end configuration (59%) and the second most used was the EC stapled anastomosis (SA) side-to-side configuration (20%). The latter had a higher AL rate compared with the hand-sewn technique (3.8% vs. 1.3%), and had significantly higher odds ratio (OR) (OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.56-4.92, p < 0.0001) for AL in the adjusted regression model. The least used technique was the end-to-side HA which also had a significantly higher OR (OR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.30-7.15, p = 0.010) compared with the end-to-end HA. Smoking was an independent factor associated with higher OR for AL.

conclusionThe ileocolic end-to-end HA was the most commonly used technique and had the lowest AL rate in MIRH for colon cancer. The EC SA technique and tobacco smoking were independent risk factors for leakage of the ileocolic anastomosis.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsSurgical StaplingAdolescentAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakCohort StudiesColectomyColonHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesAnastomosisColon cancerExtracorporealIleocolicIntracorporealLaparoscopic

Identifiers

PMID35150297
OpenAlexW4211180895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.