Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150285›Full record

ArticleSleep2022

Polysomnographic analysis of maternal sleep position and its relationship to pregnancy complications and sleep-disordered breathing.

Danielle L Wilson, Alison M Fung, Gabrielle Pell, Hannah Skrzypek, Maree Barnes, Ghada Bourjeily, Susan P Walker, Mark E Howard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Objectively Measured Maternal Supine Sleep and Fetal Growth: A Prospective Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sleeping posture in pregnancy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle L WilsonInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6754-7359
Alison M FungMercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Gabrielle PellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Hannah SkrzypekMercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Maree BarnesInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Ghada BourjeilyDepartment of Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Susan P WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mark E HowardInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7772-1496
The University of Melbourne · AUMercy Hospital for Women · AUBrown University · US

Funding

Predictors of de novo development of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancyR01HL130702 · NHLBI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI BOURJEILY, GHADA · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIH HHS HL-130702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Links between supine "going to sleep" position and stillbirth risk have led to campaigns regarding safe maternal sleep position. This study profiles the distribution of sleep positions overnight and relationships to sleep onset position during pregnancy, and the relationships between supine sleep, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and pregnancy outcomes. Data from three prospective cohort studies evaluating SDB in healthy and complicated pregnancies were pooled. All participants underwent one night of polysomnography in late pregnancy and birth outcome data were collected. 187 women underwent polysomnography at a median gestation of 34 weeks'. The left lateral position was preferred for falling asleep (52%) compared to supine (14%), but sleep onset position was the dominant sleep position overnight in only half (54%) of women. The median percentage of sleep time in the supine position was 24.2%; women who fell asleep supine spent more time supine overnight compared to those who began non-supine (48.0% (30.0,65.9) vs. 22.6% (5.7,32.2), p < .001). Women with growth-restricted fetuses were more likely to fall asleep supine than those with well-grown fetuses (36.6% vs. 7.5%, p < .001). Positional SDB was observed in 46% of those with an RDI ≥ 5. Sleep onset position was the dominant position overnight for half of the sample, suggesting that sleep onset position is not always a reliable indicator of body position overnight. Supine sleep was related to fetal growth restriction and birthweight at delivery, though causality cannot be inferred. It is critical that we pursue research into verifying the important relationship between supine sleep and increased stillbirth risk, and the mechanisms behind it.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsSleep Apnea SyndromesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSleepStillbirthSupine Positionbirthweightfetal healthlateralpolysomnographypregnantsleep apneasleep onsetsleep studysupine

Identifiers

PMID35150285
PMCPMC8996027
OpenAlexW4211260402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.