Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150150›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2022

Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Jayastu Senapati, Mahran Shoukier, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Xuemei Wang, Keyur Patel, Tapan Kadia, Farhad Ravandi, Naveen Pemmaraju, Maro Ohanian, Naval Daver and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jayastu SenapatiDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-2567
Mahran ShoukierDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482
Xuemei WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Keyur PatelDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Tapan KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-377X
Naveen PemmarajuDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1670-6513
Maro OhanianDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1689-4470
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Courtney DiNardoDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-0390
Yesid AlvaradoDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey AldrichDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-6453
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosttherapy measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is associated with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS). Elimination of MRD measured via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) for disease specific transcripts can potentially lead to better outcomes in CBF-AML.

methodsWe prospectively monitored the MRD using qRTPCR and flow cytometry on bone marrow samples in patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML who received decitabine (DAC) maintenance therapy after fludarabine/cytarabine/G-CSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation regimen. Negative qRTPCR (CMR) was defined as fusion transcript <0.01%.

resultsThirty-one patients with CBF-AML including 14 with t(8;21) and 17 with inv(16) received parenteral DAC as maintenance therapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) had completed FLAG-based induction/consolidation but with positive MRD (0.35%, range = 0.01%-0.91%) (Group 1). Sixteen patients (51.7%) could not complete recommended consolidations with FLAG-based regimen (due to older age or complications) and were switched to DAC maintenance (Group 2). In Group 2, eight patients (50%) had undetectable MRD (Group 2A) (all had qRTPCR ≤ 0.01%) and the other eight patients (50%) had residual fusion product by qRTPCR (0.1%, range = 0.02%-0.36%) (Group 2B) prior to starting DAC. Amongst the 23 patients who had a PCR ≥ 0.01% before maintenance therapy (Groups 1 and 2B), 12 patients (52%) attained a CMR as their best response (responders). The median pre-DAC qRTPCR amongst responders were 0.03% compared to 0.14% in nonresponders (p = .002). The median estimated molecular RFS amongst responders were 93.9 months. At a median follow-up of 59.3 months (13.2-106 months) from DAC initiation, 16 patients (51.6%) had to be initiated on a second line of therapy (40%, 25%, and 100% patients, respectively, in Groups1, 2A, and 2B). The median estimated time to new treatment between responders was 112.4 versus 5.8 months in nonresponders (hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.54); however, there were no difference in overall survival between these groups (p = .37).

conclusionDAC is an effective maintenance therapy for CBF-AML patients with persistent fusion transcript at a low level after FLAG-based regimen. Attainment of CMR with DAC maintenance can lead to long-term remission in patients who have persistent MRD positive after FLAG-based regimen or are unable to receive the full course of consolidation therapy.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCore Binding FactorsCytarabineDecitabineHumansNeoplasm, ResidualPrognosisCore Binding FactorsCytarabineDecitabine

Identifiers

PMID35150150
PMCPMC9303262
OpenAlexW4226264214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.