ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2022
Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venetoclax, azacitidine, and G-CSF targeting molecular residual disease in CBFB::MYH11 AML resistant to high-dose cytarabine.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- REST-driven upregulation of SFXN3 promotes AML progression via Wnt/β-catenin activation and confers decitabine resistance.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- [Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-cytarabine-homoharringtonine-based cytoreductive therapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1::RUNX1T1: a retrospective study].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Comparison of maintenance with decitabine or chemotherapy in a real-world cohort of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A tour of leukemia progress in 2025, viewed through the MD Anderson leukemia research lens.Cancer · 2025Review
- Maintenance therapy with Azacitidine for patients with myeloid malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Azacitidine as maintenance therapy in pediatricFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- DNMT3A loss drives a HIF-1-dependent synthetic lethality to HDAC6 inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Article
- Trends in allogeneic transplantation for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a longitudinal study of >15 years from the ALWP of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Genomic profiles and outcomes in de novo versus therapy-related core binding factor AML.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Hypomethylating agent monotherapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a French multicentric retrospective study.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in young, and unfit patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: advances and controversies.Haematologica · 2023Review
- Hypomethylating agent-based therapies in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia - A joint review by the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Trainee Committee.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Review
- Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.International journal of hematologic oncology · 2023Review
- Development of GBRT Model as a Novel and Robust Mathematical Model to Predict and Optimize the Solubility of Decitabine as an Anti-Cancer Drug.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Activity of decitabine as maintenance therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.American journal of hematology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPosttherapy measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is associated with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS). Elimination of MRD measured via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR) for disease specific transcripts can potentially lead to better outcomes in CBF-AML.
methodsWe prospectively monitored the MRD using qRTPCR and flow cytometry on bone marrow samples in patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML who received decitabine (DAC) maintenance therapy after fludarabine/cytarabine/G-CSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation regimen. Negative qRTPCR (CMR) was defined as fusion transcript <0.01%.
resultsThirty-one patients with CBF-AML including 14 with t(8;21) and 17 with inv(16) received parenteral DAC as maintenance therapy. Fifteen patients (48.3%) had completed FLAG-based induction/consolidation but with positive MRD (0.35%, range = 0.01%-0.91%) (Group 1). Sixteen patients (51.7%) could not complete recommended consolidations with FLAG-based regimen (due to older age or complications) and were switched to DAC maintenance (Group 2). In Group 2, eight patients (50%) had undetectable MRD (Group 2A) (all had qRTPCR ≤ 0.01%) and the other eight patients (50%) had residual fusion product by qRTPCR (0.1%, range = 0.02%-0.36%) (Group 2B) prior to starting DAC. Amongst the 23 patients who had a PCR ≥ 0.01% before maintenance therapy (Groups 1 and 2B), 12 patients (52%) attained a CMR as their best response (responders). The median pre-DAC qRTPCR amongst responders were 0.03% compared to 0.14% in nonresponders (p = .002). The median estimated molecular RFS amongst responders were 93.9 months. At a median follow-up of 59.3 months (13.2-106 months) from DAC initiation, 16 patients (51.6%) had to be initiated on a second line of therapy (40%, 25%, and 100% patients, respectively, in Groups1, 2A, and 2B). The median estimated time to new treatment between responders was 112.4 versus 5.8 months in nonresponders (hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.54); however, there were no difference in overall survival between these groups (p = .37).
conclusionDAC is an effective maintenance therapy for CBF-AML patients with persistent fusion transcript at a low level after FLAG-based regimen. Attainment of CMR with DAC maintenance can lead to long-term remission in patients who have persistent MRD positive after FLAG-based regimen or are unable to receive the full course of consolidation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.