Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35150148›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2022

What the curtains do not shield: A phenomenological exploration of patient-witnessed resuscitation in hospital. Part 1: patients' experiences.

Martina Fiori, Jos M Latour, Ruth Endacott, Clara A Cutello, Maureen Coombs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Martina FioriSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7862-0267
Jos M LatourSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-6461
Ruth EndacottNational Institute for Health Research, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-4600
Clara A CutelloSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-3457
Maureen CoombsSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6674-0093
Curtin University · AUEdinburgh Napier University · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBUniversity of Antwerp · BEVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

Resuscitation Council (UK)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the study was to explore the experiences of hospital patients who witnessed resuscitation of a fellow patient.

designDescriptive phenomenology.

methodsPatients who witnessed resuscitation were recruited from nine clinical wards in a university hospital in England. Data were collected through face-to-face individual interviews. Participants were interviewed twice,in 1 week and 4 to 6 weeks after the resuscitation event. Data were collected between August 2018 and March 2019. Interviews were analysed using Giorgi's phenomenological analysis.

resultsSixteen patients participated in the first interview and two patients completed follow-up interviews. Three themes were developed from the patients' interviews. (1) Exposure to witnessing resuscitation: patients who witness resuscitation felt exposed to a distressing event and not shielded by bed-space curtains, but after the resuscitation attempt, they also felt reassured and safe in witnessing staff's response. (2) Perceived emotional impact: patients perceived an emotional impact from witnessing resuscitation and responded with different coping mechanisms. (3) Patients' support needs: patients needed information about the resuscitation event and emotional reassurance from nursing staff to feel supported, but this was not consistently provided.

conclusionThe presence of other patients during resuscitation events must be acknowledged by healthcare professionals, and sufficient information and emotional support must be provided to patients witnessing such events. This study generates new evidence to improve patients' experience and healthcare professionals' support practices. IMPACT: The phenomenon of patient-witnessed resuscitation requires the attention of healthcare professionals, resuscitation officers and policymakers. Study findings indicate that witnessing resuscitation has an emotional impact on patients. Strategies to support them must be improved and integrated into the management of in-hospital resuscitation. These should include providing patients with comprehensive information and opportunities to speak about their experience; evacuating mobile patients when possible; and a dedicated nurse to look after patients witnessing resuscitation events.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationFamilyAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansQualitative ResearchResuscitationcardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationemergency treatmenthospitalsinterviewsnursingpatientsqualitative researchresuscitation

Identifiers

PMID35150148
PMCPMC9305153
OpenAlexW4210965385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.