ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2022
Implementation of the BC Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (BCCASS).
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of case definition algorithms for the ascertainment of congenital anomalies.Birth defects research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingCongenital anomalies (CAs) can cause lifelong morbidity and accounted for 23.2% of infant deaths from 2003 to 2007. In British Columbia (BC), surveillance of CAs has been irregular since the early 2000s. To enhance CAs surveillance in BC, the Public Health Agency of Canada has provided funding for the implementation of the BC Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (BCCASS).
interventionBCCASS is a population-based surveillance system. The system leverages existing administrative data sources that capture information regarding vital events, disease status, drug prescription, and healthcare utilization. The system uses a series of algorithms to capture specific CAs diagnoses, some of which are further validated with the support of the Provincial Advisory Committee. This Advisory Committee is a multi-stakeholder coalition that includes the BC Office of the Provincial Health Officer, subject matter experts, data partners, users, and academia, and acts to provide support, expertise, and strategic guidance to BCCASS. OUTCOMES: Through BCCASS, prevalence and historical trends for 35 CAs in BC are available. Information pertaining to maternal place of residence, risk, and protective factors can be used for association studies such as links to environmental hazards and cluster analysis. IMPLICATIONS: BCCASS is a cost-effective and sustainable system that leverages existing data sources necessary to understand the overall burden of CAs across the BC population. This is fundamental to support data-driven decisions around policy development, program planning, and evaluation of preventive measures. Strong coalitions with stakeholders are instrumental to ensure successful implementation and expansion in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.