Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149906›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis on using preheated resin composites as luting agents for indirect restorations.

Fabíola Jardim Barbon, Cristina Pereira Isolan, Leonardo Dias Soares, Alvaro Della Bona, Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa, Noéli Boscato

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabíola Jardim BarbonGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cristina Pereira IsolanGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Leonardo Dias SoaresTechnical Course in Mechanical Engineering, Sul-Rio-Grandense Federal Institute, Pelotas, Brazil.
Alvaro Della BonaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Wellington Luiz de Oliveira da RosaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Noéli BoscatoGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. noeliboscato@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-1732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review investigated the hypothesis that preheated resin composites (RCs) used as luting agents improve the mechanical properties, physicochemical performance, and color of indirect ceramic restorations. MATERIALS AND

methodsLiterature search was performed in three databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and in the grey literature (OpenGrey, ProQuest, and Catalog of Theses & Dissertations from CAPES). Eligibility criteria included only studies comparing at least one preheated RC used as a luting agent with resin cements.

resultsData regarding the mechanical properties, physicochemical characteristics, and color were analyzed qualitatively, and the microtensile bond strength and film thickness were also evaluated by meta-analysis. The search strategy identified 3894 papers, and 28 were full-text screened. Seven studies were included in the review, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference was found for microtensile bond strength (P = 0.14). Preheated RCs showed significantly higher film thickness than resin cements (P = 0.001).

conclusionOverall, the use of preheated RCs as luting agents offers similar to poorer performance than using resin cements for bonding indirect restorations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite the claim that preheated RC could be used as a luting agent, further studies should investigate the effect of clinically unacceptable film thickness.

Indexed as

Dental BondingDental CementsComposite ResinsMaterials TestingResin CementsSurface PropertiesComposite ResinsDental CementsResin CementsDental cementsHeatingIndirect restorationsLutingMechanical strength

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.