Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149814›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2022

The current dental school applicant: an overview of the admission process for UK dental schools and the sociodemographic status of applicants.

Alessandra J Booth, Katharine J Hurry, Stefan Abela

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra J BoothNIHR Dental Core Trainee Academic Clinical Fellow at the Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK. alessandra.booth@nhs.net.
Katharine J HurryNIHR Dental Core Trainee Academic Clinical Fellow at the Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Stefan AbelaDepartment of Oral Health, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims To determine the current processes used to assess dental school admissions in the UK as well as compare the applicants' demography.Methods All 16 dental schools in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire analysing the admissions protocols between 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. These data were combined with the admission process information available online. Retrospective data from the University Clinical Aptitude Test including the sociodemographic status of dental applicants were collected. For the six dental schools that did not reply, data presented were collected from information available to the public.Results The majority of applicants were women (63.2% in 2019-2020), white (27.9%) and are sixth form attendees or attend a further education college (40.6%). Of those who apply to study dentistry, 15.5% are graduates who hold a first degree. For each undergraduate dental place available, there were 12.6 applicants and 9.4 applicants to each post-qualified dental undergraduate place.Conclusion Further advancements are required to widen participation and broaden the sociodemographic status of dental applicants. This area would benefit from a long-term prospective study about recruitment methods and its correlation with performance at dental school. COVID-19 is impacting the application process, the full extent of which is yet to be determined.

Indexed as

COVID-19Schools, DentalFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2School Admission CriteriaUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID35149814
PMCPMC8832423
OpenAlexW4211090382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.