ArticleScientific reports2022
Quality of life score as a prognosticator for pharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Relationship between quality of life before treatment and survival in patients with hematological malignancies: A meta-analysis.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Global quality of life and mortality risk in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of quality of life (QOL) scores acquired not only pre-treatment, but also 1 month after treatment for locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with pharyngeal cancer treated using radiotherapy. Data for 102 patients with naso-, oro-, or hypo-pharyngeal cancer treated between December 2008 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. About 90% of the patients were male. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was used for QOL assessments. Associations between QLQ-C30 scores before and 1 month after treatment and outcomes including LRC, DMFS, and OS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Median follow-up was 37 months (range, 5-117 months). Three-year LRC, DMFS, and OS rates were 77.8%, 60.0%, and 66.5%, respectively. Pre-treatment emotional functioning and diarrhea at 1 month after treatment were identified as significant predictors of LRC. Pre-treatment global QOL and diarrhea at 1 month after treatment were detected as significant predictors of DMFS. Pre-treatment emotional functioning, pre-treatment appetite loss, and diarrhea at 1 month after treatment were detected as significant predictors of OS. Diarrhea at 1 month after treatment was the most powerful QOL variable for predicting LRC, DMFS and OS. Our study revealed that several QOL scores not only before treatment but also 1 month after treatment correlated with LRC, DMFS and OS. In particular, the diarrhea domain of QOL at 1 month after treatment offered the most powerful prognosticator for pharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.