ArticleScientific reports2022
Tomographic reconstruction from planar thermal imaging using convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Thermal Tomography with Physics-Informed Neural Networks.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- 3D Multi-Modality Medical Imaging: Combining Anatomical and Infrared Thermal Images for 3D Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Infinite-Dimensional Adaptive Boundary Observer for Inner-Domain Temperature Estimation of 3D Electrosurgical Processes using Surface Thermography Sensing.Proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigate perspectives for thermal tomography based on planar infrared thermal images. Volumetric reconstruction of temperature distribution inside an object is hardly applicable in a way similar to ionizing-radiation-based modalities due to its non-penetrating character. Here, we aim at employing the autoencoder deep neural network to collect knowledge on the single-source heat transfer model. For that purpose, we prepare a series of synthetic 3D models of a cylindrical phantom with assumed thermal properties with various heat source locations, captured at different times. A set of planar thermal images taken around the model is subjected to initial backprojection reconstruction, then passed to the deep model. This paper reports the training and testing results in terms of five metrics assessing spatial similarity between volumetric models, signal-to-noise ratio, or heat source location accuracy. We also evaluate the assumptions of the synthetic model with an experiment involving thermal imaging of a real object (pork) and a single heat source. For validation, we investigate objects with multiple heat sources of a random location and temperature. Our results show the capability of a deep model to reconstruct the temperature distribution inside the object.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.