Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia can be early predicted combining Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB score and baseline oxygen saturation.

Pilar Nuevo-Ortega, Carmen Reina-Artacho, Francisco Dominguez-Moreno, Victor Manuel Becerra-Muñoz, Luis Ruiz-Del-Fresno, Maria Antonia Estecha-Foncea, HOPE Group Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pilar Nuevo-OrtegaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain. pilarnuevoortega@gmail.com.
Carmen Reina-ArtachoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Francisco Dominguez-MorenoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Victor Manuel Becerra-MuñozIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Luis Ruiz-Del-FresnoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Maria Antonia Estecha-FonceaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
HOPE Group Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In potentially severe diseases in general and COVID-19 in particular, it is vital to early identify those patients who are going to progress to severe disease. A recent living systematic review dedicated to predictive models in COVID-19, critically appraises 145 models, 8 of them focused on prediction of severe disease and 23 on mortality. Unfortunately, in all 145 models, they found a risk of bias significant enough to finally "not recommend any for clinical use". Authors suggest concentrating on avoiding biases in sampling and prioritising the study of already identified predictive factors, rather than the identification of new ones that are often dependent on the database. Our objective is to develop a model to predict which patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are at high risk of developing severe illness or dying, using basic and validated clinical tools. We studied a prospective cohort of consecutive patients admitted in a teaching hospital during the "first wave" of the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up to discharge from hospital. Multiple logistic regression selecting variables according to clinical and statistical criteria. 404 consecutive patients were evaluated, 392 (97%) completed follow-up. Mean age was 61 years; 59% were men. The median burden of comorbidity was 2 points in the Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB was abnormal in 18% of patients and basal oxygen saturation on admission lower than 90% in 18%. A model composed of Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRB score and basal oxygen saturation can predict unfavorable evolution or death with an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89), and 0.90 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94), respectively. Prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia can be predicted without laboratory tests using two classic clinical tools and a pocket pulse oximeter.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalOxygen SaturationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSpain

Identifiers

PMID35149742
PMCPMC8837655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.