Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

PLA/Hydroxyapatite scaffolds exhibit in vitro immunological inertness and promote robust osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells without osteogenic stimuli.

Marcela P Bernardo, Bruna C R da Silva, Ahmed E I Hamouda, Marcelo A S de Toledo, Carmen Schalla, Stephan Rütten, Roman Goetzke, Luiz H C Mattoso, Martin Zenke, Antonio Sechi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcela P BernardoNational Nanotechnology Laboratory for Agribusiness, Embrapa Instrumentation, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Rua XV de Novembro, São Carlos, SP, 1452, Brazil. marcelapiassib@gmail.com.
Bruna C R da SilvaNational Nanotechnology Laboratory for Agribusiness, Embrapa Instrumentation, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Rua XV de Novembro, São Carlos, SP, 1452, Brazil.
Ahmed E I HamoudaDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Marcelo A S de ToledoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Carmen SchallaDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Stephan RüttenElectron Microscopy Facility, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Roman GoetzkeHelmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Stem Cell Biology and Cellular Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Luiz H C MattosoNational Nanotechnology Laboratory for Agribusiness, Embrapa Instrumentation, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Rua XV de Novembro, São Carlos, SP, 1452, Brazil.
Martin ZenkeDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Antonio SechiDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany. antonio.sechi@rwth-aachen.de.
RWTH Aachen University · DEBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects stand out as one of the greatest challenges of reconstructive surgery. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) allows for the printing of 3D scaffolds tailored to the morphology and size of bone damage in a patient-specific and high-precision manner. However, FDM still suffers from the lack of materials capable of efficiently supporting osteogenesis. In this study, we developed 3D-printed porous scaffolds composed of polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite (PLA/HA) composites with high ceramic contents (above 20%, w/w) by FDM. The mechanical properties of the PLA/HA scaffolds were compatible with those of trabecular bone. In vitro degradation tests revealed that HA can neutralize the acidification effect caused by PLA degradation, while simultaneously releasing calcium and phosphate ions. Importantly, 3D-printed PLA/HA did not induce the upregulation of activation markers nor the expression of inflammatory cytokines in dendritic cells thus exhibiting no immune-stimulatory properties in vitro. Evaluations using human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) showed that pure PLA scaffolds exerted an osteoconductive effect, whereas PLA/HA scaffolds efficiently induced osteogenic differentiation of MSC even in the absence of any classical osteogenic stimuli. Our findings indicate that 3D-printed PLA scaffolds loaded with high concentrations of HA are most suitable for future applications in bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisTissue ScaffoldsAdultAgedAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaCalciumCells, CulturedDendritic CellsDurapatiteHumansMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsMicePolyestersBiocompatible MaterialsCalciumDurapatitePolyesterspoly(lactide)

Identifiers

PMID35149687
PMCPMC8837663
OpenAlexW4211105289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.