Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149681›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Allosteric control of Ubp6 and the proteasome via a bidirectional switch.

Ka Ying Sharon Hung, Sven Klumpe, Markus R Eisele, Suzanne Elsasser, Geng Tian, Shuangwu Sun, Jamie A Moroco, Tat Cheung Cheng, Tapan Joshi, Timo Seibel and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structures of the 26Science advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Ka Ying Sharon HungDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Sven Klumpe *Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8350-6503
Markus R Eisele *Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Suzanne Elsasser *Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0544-9726
Geng Tian *Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Shuangwu SunDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jamie A MorocoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Tat Cheung ChengDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Tapan JoshiDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Timo SeibelDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Duco Van DalenLeiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333, Leiden, ZC, the Netherlands.
Xin-Hua FengLife Sciences Institute (LSI), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Ying LuDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Huib OvaaLeiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333, Leiden, ZC, the Netherlands.
John R EngenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6918-9476
Byung-Hoon LeeDepartment of New Biology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, 42988, Korea. byung-hoon_lee@dgist.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7101-0471
Till RudackBiospectroscopy, Center for Protein Diagnostics (PRODI), Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany. till.rudack@rub.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2693-9561
Eri SakataDepartment of Molecular Structural Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. eri.sakata@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8580-3683
Daniel FinleyDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. daniel_finley@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-5863
Harvard University · USMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLNortheastern University · USUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEDaegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology · KRUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEZhejiang University · CN

Funding

UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN CONJUGATES AND FUSIONSR01GM043601 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI FINLEY, DANIEL J · 1990 to 2020
$4.3M
Determine the mechanism of recognition of ubiquitin configurations by the 26S proteasomeR01GM134064 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LU, YING · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Extending the applications of hydrogen exchange mass spectrometryR01GM101135 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ENGEN, JOHN R · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101135NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteasome recognizes ubiquitinated proteins and can also edit ubiquitin marks, allowing substrates to be rejected based on ubiquitin chain topology. In yeast, editing is mediated by deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp6. The proteasome activates Ubp6, whereas Ubp6 inhibits the proteasome through deubiquitination and a noncatalytic effect. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of the proteasome bound to Ubp6, based on which we identify mutants in Ubp6 and proteasome subunit Rpt1 that abrogate Ubp6 activation. The Ubp6 mutations define a conserved region that we term the ILR element. The ILR is found within the BL1 loop, which obstructs the catalytic groove in free Ubp6. Rpt1-ILR interaction opens the groove by rearranging not only BL1 but also a previously undescribed network of three interconnected active-site-blocking loops. Ubp6 activation and noncatalytic proteasome inhibition are linked in that they are eliminated by the same mutations. Ubp6 and ubiquitin together drive proteasomes into a unique conformation associated with proteasome inhibition. Thus, a multicomponent allosteric switch exerts simultaneous control over both Ubp6 and the proteasome.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesCatalytic DomainCryoelectron MicroscopyCytoplasmEndopeptidasesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein ConformationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitinUbiquitinated ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesEndopeptidasesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRPT1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitinUbiquitinated ProteinsUBP6 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID35149681
PMCPMC8837689
OpenAlexW4220789290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.