Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149680›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Coordinated hippocampal-thalamic-cortical communication crucial for engram dynamics underneath systems consolidation.

Douglas Feitosa Tomé, Sadra Sadeh, Claudia Clopath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repetition dynamically and rapidly increases cortical, but not hippocampal, offline reactivation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Memory's gatekeeper: The role of PFC in the encoding of congruent events.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A model of autonomous interactions between hippocampus and neocortex driving sleep-dependent memory consolidation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Douglas Feitosa ToméDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-8412
Sadra SadehDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-5461
Claudia ClopathDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. c.clopath@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-8648

Funding

Reexamining the Role of Dendrites in Neuronal FunctionRM1NS132981 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jayeeta Basu, RAFAEL YUSTE · 2023 to 2026
$10.3M
Linking Plasticity of Hippocampal Representation across the Single Neuron and Circuit LevelsR01NS109994 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BASU, JAYEETA, CLOPATH, CLAUDIA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N013956/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019008/1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109994NINDS NIH HHS RM1 NS132981Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 200790/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems consolidation refers to the time-dependent reorganization of memory representations or engrams across brain regions. Despite recent advancements in unravelling this process, the exact mechanisms behind engram dynamics and the role of associated pathways remain largely unknown. Here we propose a biologically-plausible computational model to address this knowledge gap. By coordinating synaptic plasticity timescales and incorporating a hippocampus-thalamus-cortex circuit, our model is able to couple engram reactivations across these regions and thereby reproduce key dynamics of cortical and hippocampal engram cells along with their interdependencies. Decoupling hippocampal-thalamic-cortical activity disrupts systems consolidation. Critically, our model yields testable predictions regarding hippocampal and thalamic engram cells, inhibitory engrams, thalamic inhibitory input, and the effect of thalamocortical synaptic coupling on retrograde amnesia induced by hippocampal lesions. Overall, our results suggest that systems consolidation emerges from coupled reactivations of engram cells in distributed brain regions enabled by coordinated synaptic plasticity timescales in multisynaptic subcortical-cortical circuits.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommunicationHippocampusMemory ConsolidationMiceNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsThalamus

Identifiers

PMID35149680
PMCPMC8837777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.