Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149607›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of nursing2022

CE: Assessing Movement-Evoked Pain.

Staja Booker, Paul Arnstein, Rianne van Boekel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Staja BookerStaja Booker is an assistant professor at the University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Paul Arnstein is a clinical nurse specialist for pain relief and a Connell Scholar at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Rianne van Boekel is an assistant professor and postdoctoral researcher at Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegan, The Netherlands. Contact author: Staja Booker, bookers@ufl.edu . Booker has received funding from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR076463-01). The authors and planners have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. A podcast with the authors is available at www.ajnonline.com .
Paul Arnstein
Rianne van Boekel

Funding

Investigating Movement-evoked Pain in osteoArthritic Conditions (IMPACT): An Observational Study to Inform Culturally-Tailored Intervention DevelopmentK23AR076463 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOOKER, STAJA · 2020 to 2022
$379k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR076463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractOne of the most common and nuanced tasks that nurses perform is pain assessment, particularly in acute postoperative settings where frequent reassessments are needed. Most assessments are limited to obtaining a pain intensity score with little attention paid to the conditions necessitating the assessment or the factors contributing to the pain. Pain is frequently assessed during rest, but seldom during periods of movement or activity, which is a crucial omission given that acute postoperative movement-evoked pain (MEP) is intense and a common barrier to healing and restoration of function. In addition to physical limitations, MEP can impede cognitive, emotional, and social functioning in ways that can contribute to chronic pain, mood disorders, and disability. Professional and regulatory standards are moving away from a focus on pain intensity to an emphasis on its context, impact on function, and associated distress. Thus, there are many driving forces compelling nurses to integrate MEP assessments into practice to expedite the restoration of biopsychosocial functioning in postoperative patients. The authors discuss the clinical significance of a MEP assessment as well as protocols and tools for completing such assessments.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPersons with DisabilitiesHumansPain MeasurementPostoperative Pain

Identifiers

PMID35149607
PMCPMC11198877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.