Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149600›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2022

Advancing whole-of-government approaches to tobacco control: Article 5.3 and the challenge of policy coordination in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India and Uganda.

Rachel Ann Barry, S M Abdullah, Aastha Chugh, Selamawit Hirpa, Praveen Kumar, Denis Male, Rob Ralston, Tracey Wagner-Rizvi, Jeff Collin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interventions for Tobacco Prevention and Control in Humanitarian Settings: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel Ann BarryGlobal Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK rbarry3@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1683-7895
S M AbdullahDepartment of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-2253
Aastha ChughHRIDAY, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-3394
Selamawit HirpaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Praveen KumarDepartment of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Denis MaleDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rob RalstonGlobal Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-3565
Tracey Wagner-RizviGlobal Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4582-8923
Jeff CollinGlobal Health Policy Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027946/2Medical Research Council MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite an extensive evidence base on the diverse economic, environmental and social benefits of tobacco control, difficulties in establishing coordinated national approaches remain a defining challenge for Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) implementation. Minimising tobacco industry interference is seen as key to effective coordination, and this paper analyses implementation of Article 5.3 guidelines, exploring implications for whole-of-government approaches to tobacco control in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India and Uganda.

methodsBased on 131 semistructured interviews with government officials and other key stakeholders, we explore barriers and facilitators for promoting: (1)

resultsOur analysis identifies common barriers to coordination across diverse geographical contexts and varying approaches to implementation. They highlight broadly shared experiences of limited understanding and engagement beyond health agencies; restricted responsibility and uncertainty amid conflicting mandates; tensions with wider governance practices and norms; limited capacity and authority of coordination mechanisms; and obstacles to vertical coordination across local, state and national governments. Interview data also indicate important opportunities to advance coordination across sectors and government levels, with Article 5.3 measures capable of informing changes in practices, building support in other sectors, allowing for 'bottom-up' innovation and being shaped by engagement with civil society.

conclusionSupporting effective implementation of Article 5.3 is key to advancing multisectoral approaches to FCTC implementation and tobacco control's contributions to global health and sustainable development.

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryBangladeshEthiopiaGovernmentHealth PolicyHumansPolicySmoking PreventionUgandaWorld Health Organizationglobal healthlow/middle-income countrypublic policytobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID35149600
PMCPMC9125369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.