Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149577›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.

Jianqiao Zheng, Li Du, Xiaoqian Deng, Lu Zhang, Jia Wang, Guo Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06226246 (Evaluation of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Dispatcher Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06226246 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Dispatcher Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled75ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsHEROS VR CPR training program, Conventional HEROS CPR training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianqiao ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8091-1837
Li DuDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoqian DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jia WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Guo ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China Anesthesiology_SCU@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the most critical procedure in the rescue of patients with sudden cardiac death (SCD). The success rate of CPR remains far below expectations, which made CPR education identified as the top priority for SCD. CPR training using the virtual reality (VR) technique is a feasible training method, with a wider population and lower cost, but its efficacy remains controversial. Thus, we will perform a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the efficacy of the VR technique on CPR quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese BioMedical Literature, Wanfang and VIP databases from inception to November 2021, to identify randomised controlled trials and the first period in randomised cross-over trials assessing the efficacy of VR techniques versus non-VR techniques for adult participants accepting adult CPR training. No language restrictions will be considered. Data synthesis will be performed using RevMan V.5.4 and Stata/MP V.16.0. Outcome measures will be present as relative risk with 95% CIs for dichotomous data and mean difference with 95% CIs for continuous data. The primary outcome will be the CPR quality defined as chest compression rate and depth. Secondary outcomes will be the overall performance of CPR. Heterogeneity will be assessed by the χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review protocol. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021281059.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationVirtual RealityAdultHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicThoraxaccident & emergency medicinecardiologymedical education & trainingpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35149577
PMCPMC8845316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.