Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35149536›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

cfTrack: A Method of Exome-Wide Mutation Analysis of Cell-free DNA to Simultaneously Monitor the Full Spectrum of Cancer Treatment Outcomes Including MRD, Recurrence, and Evolution.

Shuo Li, Weihua Zeng, Xiaohui Ni, Yonggang Zhou, Mary L Stackpole, Zorawar S Noor, Zuyang Yuan, Adam Neal, Sanaz Memarzadeh, Edward B Garon and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive tissue deconvolution of cell-free DNA by deep learning for disease diagnosis and monitoring.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shuo LiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1960-6016
Weihua ZengDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Xiaohui NiEarlyDiagnostics Inc., Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3626-3588
Yonggang ZhouDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Mary L StackpoleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4432-6718
Zorawar S NoorDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Zuyang YuanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Adam NealDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Sanaz MemarzadehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Edward B GaronDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7077-8801
Steven M DubinettDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Wenyuan LiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Xianghong Jasmine ZhouDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
The UCLA Center in Early Detection of Liver CancerU01CA230705 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Vatche Agopian, Samuel Wheeler French · 2018 to 2026
$6.6M
A model for predicting response to PD-1 inhibitors in NSCLCR01CA208403 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GARON, EDWARD B · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Novel Computation Methods for the Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Sequence DataR01CA246329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M., LI, WENYUAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.2M
Informatics resources for liquid biopsy researchU01CA237711 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, WENYUAN · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
An Accurate, Non-invasive, and Cost-effective Methylome Test for Early Cancer DetectionR43CA246941 · NCI · EARLYDIAGNOSTICS, INC. · PI NI, XIAOHUI · 2020 to 2020
$352k
Reactivating p53 Function with a Novel Structure-based Peptide as a Therapeutic Approach for Overcoming Platinum ResistanceI01BX004651 · VA · VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI MEMARZADEH, SANAZ · 2020 to 2023
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004651NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208403NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246329NCI NIH HHS R43 CA246941NCI NIH HHS U01 CA230705NCI NIH HHS U01 CA237711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a noninvasive approach to monitor cancer. Here we develop a method using whole-exome sequencing (WES) of cfDNA for simultaneously monitoring the full spectrum of cancer treatment outcomes, including minimal residual disease (MRD), recurrence, evolution, and second primary cancers. EXPERIMENTAL

designThree simulation datasets were generated from 26 patients with cancer to benchmark the detection performance of MRD/recurrence and second primary cancers. For further validation, cfDNA samples (n = 76) from patients with cancer (n = 35) with six different cancer types were used for performance validation during various treatments.

resultsWe present a cfDNA-based cancer monitoring method, named cfTrack. Taking advantage of the broad genome coverage of WES data, cfTrack can sensitively detect MRD and cancer recurrence by integrating signals across known clonal tumor mutations of a patient. In addition, cfTrack detects tumor evolution and second primary cancers by de novo identifying emerging tumor mutations. A series of machine learning and statistical denoising techniques are applied to enhance the detection power. On the simulation data, cfTrack achieved an average AUC of 99% on the validation dataset and 100% on the independent dataset in detecting recurrence in samples with tumor fractions ≥0.05%. In addition, cfTrack yielded an average AUC of 88% in detecting second primary cancers in samples with tumor fractions ≥0.2%. On real data, cfTrack accurately monitors tumor evolution during treatment, which cannot be accomplished by previous methods.

conclusionsOur results demonstrated that cfTrack can sensitively and specifically monitor the full spectrum of cancer treatment outcomes using exome-wide mutation analysis of cfDNA.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryBiomarkers, TumorExomeExome SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID35149536
PMCPMC9126584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.