ArticleResuscitation2022
Severe cerebral edema in substance-related cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Resuscitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overdose-Related Cardiac Arrest in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic.Critical care clinics · 2026Review
- Automated detection of severe cerebral edema using explainable deep transfer learning after hypoxic ischemic brain injury.Resuscitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies of neurologic outcomes have found conflicting results regarding differences between patients with substance-related cardiac arrests (SRCA) and non-SRCA. We investigate the effects of SRCA on severe cerebral edema development, a neuroimaging intermediate endpoint for neurologic injury.
methods327 out-of-hospital comatose cardiac arrest patients were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were examined. SRCA categorization was based on admission toxicology screens. Severe cerebral edema classification was based on radiology reports. Poor clinical outcomes were defined as discharge Cerebral Performance Category scores > 3.
resultsSRCA patients (N = 86) were younger (P < 0.001), and more likely to have non-shockable rhythms (P < 0.001), be unwitnessed (P < 0.001), lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P < 0.001), absent brainstem reflexes (P < 0.05) and develop severe cerebral edema (P < 0.001) than non-SRCA patients (N = 241). Multivariable analyses found younger age (P < 0.001), female sex (P = 0.008), non-shockable rhythm (P = 0.01) and SRCA (P = 0.05) to be predictors of severe cerebral edema development. Older age (P < 0.001), non-shockable rhythm (P = 0.02), severe cerebral edema (P < 0.001), and absent pupillary light reflexes (P = 0.004) were predictors of poor outcomes. SRCA patients had higher proportion of brain deaths (P < 0.001) compared to non-SRCA patients.
conclusionsSRCA results in higher rates of severe cerebral edema development and brain death. The absence of statistically significant differences in discharge outcomes or survival between SRCA and non-SRCA patients may be related to the higher rate of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) in the non-SRCA group. Future neuroprognostic studies may opt to include neuroimaging markers as intermediate measures of neurologic injury which are not influenced by WLST decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.