ArticleGynecologic oncology2022
A qualitative study of patients' attitudes towards telemedicine for gynecologic cancer care.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: A systematic review.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Priority setting of teleoncology services, and their barriers, and facilitators from oncologists and patients perspectives: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Gynaecological oncology services: A qualitative exploration of womens' perspectives at a teaching hospital in North East India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Telemedicine Use Among Urban and Rural Patients With Urologic Malignancies.JU open plus · 2025Article
- Telehealth in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study of Patient, Researcher, and Clinician Perspectives.O&G open · 2024Article
- Patient perspective on virtual prechemotherapy visits in gynecologic oncology.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Perceptions of adult patients with cancer towards telemedicine: A qualitative meta-synthesis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Enhanced Recovery in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery-State of the Science.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Teleoncology: A Solution for Everyone? A Single-Center Experience with Telemedicine during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- The long game: Telemedicine patient satisfaction metrics and methods of recurrence detection for gynecologic cancer patients throughout the initial year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWomen with gynecologic cancers may face geographic barriers to standard-of-care consultation with a gynecologic oncologist. While telemedicine may help overcome these geographic barriers, there are no qualitative data exploring gynecologic cancer patients' attitudes towards telemedicine for cancer care. Patients with gynecologic malignancies may have preferences distinct from general oncology populations due to the sensitive nature of the diseases and anatomy involved.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 patients with gynecologic cancers to identify perceived advantages and disadvantages of telemedicine use for gynecologic cancer care. Past experience with telemedicine was elicited as were suggestions for cancer care encounters most compatible with telemedicine. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for emergent themes.
resultsAll patients interviewed were open to the use of telemedicine. Emergent themes regarding advantages of telemedicine included convenience, cost savings, reduced travel, avoidance of infectious disease, and availability of care for those too unwell for in-person visits. Themes regarding disadvantages of telemedical care included technical difficulties, perceived need for examination or testing, and potential compromise of therapeutic relationship. Patients were particularly concerned that difficulty in establishing a therapeutic relationship would compromise initial consultations with gynecologic oncologists via telemedicine.
conclusionPatients with gynecologic cancer are open to use of telemedicine for their care. Particular attention should be paid to overcoming patients' hesitancy to have initial visits with gynecologic oncologists, as these consultations have the greatest potential to improve access to high-quality gynecologic cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.