Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148800›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Feasibility of a randomized clinical trial evaluating a community intervention for household tuberculosis child contact management in Cameroon and Uganda.

Anca Vasiliu, Georges Tiendrebeogo, Muhamed Mbunka Awolu, Cecilia Akatukwasa, Boris Youngui Tchakounte, Bob Ssekyanzi, Boris Kevin Tchounga, Daniel Atwine, Martina Casenghi, Maryline Bonnet and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03832023 (Community Intervention for Tuberculosis Active Contact Tracing and Preventive Therapy - a Cluster Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03832023 nacompletednot on this map

Community Intervention for Tuberculosis Active Contact Tracing and Preventive Therapy - a Cluster Randomized Study (CONTACT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationRan2019 to 2022Enrolled1,400ConditionsTuberculosisArmsScreening and initiating preventive therapy in communities
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tuberculosis Infection in Children and Adolescents.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anca VasiliuUniversity of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, TransVIHMI, Montpellier, France. anca.vasiliu@ird.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-7859
Georges TiendrebeogoUniversity of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, TransVIHMI, Montpellier, France.
Muhamed Mbunka AwoluElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Cecilia AkatukwasaEpicentre Research Center, Mbarara, Uganda.
Boris Youngui TchakounteElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Bob SsekyanziEpicentre Research Center, Mbarara, Uganda.
Boris Kevin TchoungaElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Daniel AtwineEpicentre Research Center, Mbarara, Uganda.
Martina CasenghiElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Maryline BonnetUniversity of Montpellier, IRD, INSERM, TransVIHMI, Montpellier, France.
CONTACT study group
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · USEpicentre Uganda · UGInserm · FRAgropolis International · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the main barriers of the management of household tuberculosis child contacts is the necessity for parents to bring healthy children to the facility. We assessed the feasibility of a community intervention for tuberculosis (TB) household child contact management and the conditions for its evaluation in a cluster randomized controlled trial in Cameroon and Uganda.

methodsWe assessed three dimensions of feasibility using a mixed method approach: (1) recruitment capability using retrospective aggregated data from facility registers; (2) acceptability of the intervention using focus group discussions with TB patients and in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and community leaders; and (3) adaptation, integration, and resources of the intervention in existing TB services using a survey and discussions with stakeholders.

resultsReaching the sample size is feasible in all clusters in 15 months with the condition of regrouping 2 facilities in the same cluster in Uganda due to decentralization of TB services. Community health worker (CHW) selection and training and simplified tools for contact screening, tolerability, and adherence of preventive therapy were key elements for the implementation of the community intervention. Healthcare providers and patients found the intervention of child contact investigations and TB preventive treatment management in the household acceptable in both countries due to its benefits (competing priorities, transport cost) as compared to facility-based management. TB stigma was present, but not a barrier for the community intervention. Visit schedule and team conduct were identified as key facilitators for the intervention.

conclusionsThis study shows that evaluating a community intervention for TB child contact management in a cluster randomized trial is feasible in Cameroon and Uganda.

trial registrationClini calTr ials. gov NCT03832023 . Registered on February 6

Indexed as

AcceptabilityActive contact investigationCluster randomized trialCommunity interventionComplex interventionFeasibilityMixed methodsPediatric tuberculosisTuberculosis preventive therapyTuberculosis screening

Identifiers

PMID35148800
PMCPMC8832743
OpenAlexW4226017722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.