Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148793›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2022

Problematic Internet Use, health behaviors, depression and eating disorders: a cross-sectional study among Polish medical school students.

Marta Kożybska, Jacek Kurpisz, Iwona Radlińska, Edyta Skwirczyńska, Natalia Serwin, Paulina Zabielska, Artur Kotwas, Beata Karakiewicz, Zofia Lebiecka, Jerzy Samochowiec and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta KożybskaSubdepartment of Medical Law, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-0548
Jacek KurpiszDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland. jacek.kurpisz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8357-2626
Iwona RadlińskaSubdepartment of Medical Law, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Edyta SkwirczyńskaDepartment of Medical History and Ethics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Natalia SerwinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Paulina ZabielskaSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Artur KotwasSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Beata KarakiewiczSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Zofia LebieckaDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Jerzy SamochowiecDepartment and Clinic of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Kinga Flaga-GieruszyńskaResearch Team On the Civil Procedural Law and the Informatisation of the Judiciary, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Szczecin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic Internet Use is defined as a use of the Internet which leads to various difficulties. The aim of this study was to check whether Problematic Internet Use is associated with health risks, such as: anti-health behaviors, depressive symptoms, abnormal body weight or eating disorders.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 540 medical school students of Polish descent (83.5% females; 16.5% males), whose mean age was 22.49 years (SD = 5.20). The participants were asked to complete a questionnaire set, including the Problematic Internet Use Test, Juczyński's Health-Related Behavior Inventory, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Eating Attitudes Test and a self-designed demographic survey.

resultsIncreased Problematic Internet Use scores were observed in male, full-time students, persons who use the Internet on the computer (compared to those who mostly use it on the phone), and those who go online mainly for entertainment purposes (compared to those who indicated another main purpose of using the Internet). 47.6% of the sample reported poor health behaviors, while 27.1% met the criteria of a depressive episode and 6.9% of an eating disorder. High risk of Problematic Internet Use was observed in 2.8% of the sample, particularly those who reported having more free time during the day, engaged in fewer health protective behaviors, manifested more severe depressive symptoms and scored higher on the Eating Attitudes Test.

conclusionSuch results indicate that students with Problematic Internet Use lead an unhealthy lifestyle and more often show symptoms of depression and eating disorders than students without Problematic Internet Use.

Indexed as

DepressionEating disordersHealth behaviorsPolandProblematic Internet Use students

Identifiers

PMID35148793
PMCPMC8832421
OpenAlexW4211136797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.