Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148728›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

The methods and use of questionnaires for the diagnosis of dental phobia by Japanese dental practitioners specializing in special needs dentistry and dental anesthesiology: a cross-sectional study.

Mika Ogawa, Terumi Ayuse, Toshiaki Fujisawa, Shuntaro Sato, Takao Ayuse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mika OgawaSection of Anesthesiology, Department of Diagnostics and General Care, Fukuoka Dental University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Terumi AyuseDepartment of Special Care Dentistry, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan. ttagawa@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Toshiaki FujisawaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shuntaro SatoClinical Research Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Takao AyuseDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Nagasaki University Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Course of Medical and Dental Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University Hospital · JPFukuoka Dental College · JPHokkaido University · JPNagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental phobia is covered by medical insurance; however, the diagnostic methods are not standardized in Japan. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the methods and use of questionnaires for the diagnosis of dental phobia by Japanese dental practitioners specializing in special needs dentistry and dental anesthesiology.

methodsWe conducted an online survey to obtain information from the members of the Japanese Society for Disability and Oral Health (JSDH, n = 5134) and the Japanese Dental Society of Anesthesiology (JDSA, n = 2759). Response items included gender, qualification, affiliation type, methods of diagnosis and management of dental phobia, use of questionnaire, need to establish standardized diagnostic method for dental phobia, and others. The chi-squared test was used to compare answers between the three groups: JSDH only, JDSA only, and both JSDH and JDSA. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with the use of an assessment questionnaire.

resultsData were obtained from 614 practitioners (JSDH only, n = 329; JDSA only, n = 195; both JSDH and JDSA: n = 90, response rate: 7.8% [614/7,893], men: n = 364 [58.5%]). Only 9.7% of practitioners used questionnaires to quantify the level of dental anxiety. The members of both JSDH and JDSA group used questionnaires more frequently than members of the JSDH only (19% and 7.1%, respectively; Bonferroni corrected p < 0.01). Most practitioners (89.1%) diagnosed dental phobia based on patient complaints of fear of treatment. Furthermore, majority of the participants (73.3%) felt the need to establish standardized diagnostic method for "dental phobia." Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that membership of the JSDH only was negatively related (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.60), and use of behavioral therapy was positively related (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.18-4.84) to the use of a questionnaire.

conclusionsThe results of this study showed that the use of questionnaires was very low, patients' subjective opinions were commonly used to diagnose dental phobia, and a standardized diagnostic criterion was thus needed among practitioners. Therefore, it is necessary to establish diagnostic criteria for dental phobia in line with the Japanese clinical system and to educate dentists about them.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyCross-Sectional StudiesDental AnxietyDentistryDentistsHumansJapanMaleProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesDental anesthesiologyDental phobiaDental practitionerQuestionnaireSpecial needs dentistry

Identifiers

PMID35148728
PMCPMC8832685
OpenAlexW4220944704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.