Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148717›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Risk of sequelae after invasive meningococcal disease.

Sidsel Skou Voss, Jens Nielsen, Palle Valentiner-Branth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management and prevention of Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in the context of evolving antimicrobial resistance trends.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Investigation of invasiveFrontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Meningococcal carriage in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study, Iceland, 2019 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sidsel Skou VossEuropean Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden. sisv@ssi.dk.
Jens NielsenInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Palle Valentiner-BranthInfectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DKEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare but severe bacterial infection, of which a high proportion of survivors are affected by sequelae. In Denmark, IMD is a notifiable disease and data collection on sequelae information has been automated, enabling studies of sequelae due to IMD diagnosed after discharge. The aim of this study was to examine possible determinants for sequelae after IMD and to describe the distribution of sequelae by age, serogroup and clinical presentation, for all cases in Denmark from 2005-2020.

methodsData from The National Database for Notifiable Infectious Diseases was linked to data from The Danish National Patient Register and the Civil Registration System. Logistic regression models were used to study whether age, serogroup and/or clinical presentation were associated with sequelae. A descriptive analysis of the proportion of different types of sequelae across age groups, serogroups and clinical presentations was performed.

resultsIn total, 25% of IMD survivors experienced one or more sequelae. We found no significant association between sequelae and age. The five most common sequelae in decreasing order of incidence were hearing loss, epilepsy, learning disabilities, headache and visual defects/loss of vision, with rates ranging from 8.2 to 2.8% of IMD survivors. The proportion of survivors with hearing loss and visual defects/loss of vision was not significantly different between clinical presentations.

conclusionsWe suggest revising IMD treatment guidelines, to include routine referral to hearing and vision tests, irrespective of clinical presentation. Furthermore, it is important to increase the awareness among parents of children who have had IMD of possible future learning disabilities to make sure that necessary measures are taken in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Meningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidisChildHumansIncidenceSerogroupSurvivorsMeningococcal VaccinesDeterminants/factorsEpidemiologyInvasive meningococcal diseaseSequelaeSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35148717
PMCPMC8831877
OpenAlexW4210955569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.