Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148707›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Antipsychotic prescribing patterns in Australia: a retrospective analysis.

Nagesh Pai, Mustafa Acar, Prabhjot Juneja, Mahsa Hosseini Kouhkamari, Sinthuja Siva, Judy Mullan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug-Induced Myoclonus: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prescribing pattern of antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia using the total daily dose online tool.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nagesh PaiSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong (UOW), Wollongong, Australia. nagesh@uow.edu.au.
Mustafa AcarJanssen-Cilag Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Prabhjot JunejaProspection, Redfern, NSW, Australia.
Mahsa Hosseini KouhkamariProspection, Redfern, NSW, Australia.
Sinthuja SivaJanssen-Cilag Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
Judy MullanSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong (UOW), Wollongong, Australia.
University of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine real-world patterns of antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia Australia.

methodsThis retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample data. Included data were for patients aged 16-years or older who initiated treatment for the first time with a PBS-reimbursed antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia between July 2013 and September 2017. Patterns of treatment usage were summarised descriptively. Differences in prescribing patterns by age and prescribing year were reported. Treatment persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with differences explored using log-rank tests. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

results6,740 patients, representing 8,249 non-unique patients, received prescriptions for antipsychotic medications. Patients were aged 16 years to over 85 years (54.5% were < 55 years) and two-thirds of patients were male (61%). The majority of treatment episodes (62%, n = 5,139/8,249) were prescribed an atypical oral antipsychotic. Typical long-acting antipsychotic therapies (LATs) were prescribed 19% of the treatment episodes (n = 1,608/8,249. There was a small increase in prescribing of atypical LAT and typical LAT and a small decrease in atypical oral and clozapine prescribing over the study period. Treatment persistence was greatest in patients treated with clozapine, than in those treated with atypical LATs.

conclusionsWhile the majority of patients receive atypical antipsychotic medications, one in five continue to use older typical LAT therapies. Patient age and time on therapy may be associated with choice of therapy. Persistence to atypical LAT therapy is better than for other treatment modalities in this real-world cohort.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineAustraliaHumansMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineClinical guidelinesLong-acting antipsychotic(s)Oral antipsychotic(s)PersistencePrescribing patternsSchizophreniaTherapeutic relationship

Identifiers

PMID35148707
PMCPMC8840322
OpenAlexW4211136986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.