Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148675›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Barriers to and motives for engagement in an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in Ireland: a qualitative study.

Alison Bourke, Vikram Niranjan, Raymond O'Connor, Catherine Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Self-Management-Centric Cardiac Rehabilitation for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison BourkeSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. alisonbourke155@gmail.com.
Vikram NiranjanSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Raymond O'ConnorSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Catherine WoodsHealth Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsufficient physical activity (PA) is a leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Ireland's public healthcare system, the Health Service Executive (HSE), has supported the development of the National Exercise Referral Framework (NERF) to tackle low levels of PA amongst those with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). 'NERF centres' are medically supervised PA programmes across Ireland that have established referral pathways with local hospitals and general practitioners. ULMedX is one such NERF centre offering exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) with the aim of intervention development to reduce early drop-out and maximise adherence for optimal health benefits.

aimThe purpose of this research was to identify the major factors influencing participants' adherence and early drop-out at ULMedX. Exploring areas for future development were also prioritised. DESIGN &

settingQualitative interviews were conducted with long-term attenders and people who have dropped out (PWDO) from ULMedX.

methodsGuided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour the 1-1 semi-structured interviews were performed, transcribed, and evaluated through thematic analysis.

resultsAnalysis was performed on 14 participants (50% female; mean age 67.3 years), comprising long-term attenders (n = 7; 13-month duration, 64% of classes) and PWDO (n = 7; 2.8-month duration, 22% of classes). Three major factors affecting adherence and drop-out were identified: social support, perceived outcomes from participation and practical barriers to attendance. Areas for future development included the provision of evening and advanced classes, psychological support, more exercise variety, more educational seminars and new members start as their own group.

conclusionThe findings suggest participants at ULMedX are more likely to have had a better experience and commit to the programme if they believed involvement would benefit their physical and mental health, increase their exercise motivation by engendering a positive attitude to exercise, and that the ability to attend was within their control. Future interventions at ULMedX should have their structures centred around these motives for engagement. ULMedX should also test the participant recommendations to overcome the common barriers to adherence.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationMotivationAgedExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIrelandMaleBarrierscardiac rehabilitationMotivesNational exercise referral frameworkPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35148675
PMCPMC8832858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.