Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148645›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Location of Hamstring Injuries Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Sylvain Grange, Gustaaf Reurink, Anh Quoc Nguyen, Camille Riviera-Navarro, Clément Foschia, Pierre Croisille, Pascal Edouard

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Traumatic muscle injury.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sylvain GrangeInter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Science (LIBM EA 7424), University of Lyon, University Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France.
Gustaaf ReurinkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anh Quoc NguyenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Camille Riviera-NavarroDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, Sports Medicine Unity, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Clément FoschiaDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, Sports Medicine Unity, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Pierre CroisilleCREATIS, UMR CNRS 5220-INSERM U1206, F-69621, Villeurbanne, France.
Pascal EdouardInter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Science (LIBM EA 7424), University of Lyon, University Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHamstring muscle injury location using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not so well described in the literature.

objectiveTo describe the location of hamstring injuries using MRI. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: The full text of studies, in English, had to be available. Case reports and reviews were excluded. Included studies must report the location of hamstring injuries using MRI within 8 days of the acute injury. STUDY

designSystematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: A first screening was conducted based on title and abstract of the articles. In the second screening, the full text of the remaining articles was evaluated for the fulfillment of the inclusion criteria.

resultsFrom the 2788 references initially found in 5 databases, we included 34 studies, reporting a total of 2761 acute hamstring injuries. The most frequent muscle head involved was the long head of the biceps femoris (BFLH) (70%), followed by the semitendinosus (ST) (15%), generally associated with BFLH. The most frequent tissue affected was the myotendinous junction (MTJ) accounting for half the cases (52%). Among all lesions, the distribution between proximal, central, and distal lesions looked homogenous, with 34.0%, 33.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The stretching mechanism, while only reported in 2 articles, represented 3% of all reported mechanisms, appears responsible for a specific lesion involving the proximal tendon of the semimembranosus (SM), and leading to a longer time out from sport.

conclusionBFLH was the most often affected hamstring injuries and MTJ was the most affected tissue. In addition, the distal, central, and proximal locations were homogeneously distributed. We also noted that MRI descriptions of hamstring injuries are often poor and did not take full advantage of the MRI strengths. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Before study initiation, the study was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42018107580).

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesLeg InjuriesSoft Tissue InjuriesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyhamstringlocationMRImusclesports injurystraintear

Identifiers

PMID35148645
PMCPMC9808837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.