ArticleClinical oral implants research2022
Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023Pooled it
- Fully Guided Implant Placement and Immediate Loading for the Restoration of the Edentulous Maxilla with a Fixed Dental Prosthesis: Report of Two Clinical Cases.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Densifying the Future: A Critical Review of Osseodensification and Implant Dentistry.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Influence of Bone Density and Guide Protocol on the Accuracy of Self-Cutting Implants Using Static Guided Implant Placement-An In Vitro Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Placement in Narrow Ridge by Novice Clinicians.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Optimizing Dental Implant Success: Biomechanical Insights, Computer-Guided Precision and The Role of Open Guide Systems in Achieving Cost-Effective and Accessible Treatment.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The Effect of Different Socket Morphologies of a Maxillary Central Incisor on the Accuracy of Immediate Implants Placed With Freehand or Guided Surgery-An In Vitro Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided Implant Surgical Guides: A Prospective In Vivo Study of the Impact of Template Design.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- The accuracy of different macrogeometry of dental implant in dynamic navigation guided immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone: an in vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of template design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2025Article
- Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this in vitro study was to determine accuracy defined by trueness and precision of computer-assisted implant surgery comparing two guided surgery kits designed for either closed sleeves or open sleeves with a lateral window. MATERIAL AND
methodsEach n=20 implants were placed fully guided (sleeve-bone distance of 2 or 4 mm) in identical replicas using a surgical guide with both closed sleeve or an open sleeve, partially guided, or free hand. The achieved implant position was digitized and compared with the planned position. Trueness and precision were determined. The angular deviation was defined as the primary outcome parameter. The means, standard deviation, and 95%-confidence intervals were analyzed statistically with 1-way ANOVA and the Scheffé procedure.
resultsThe accuracy of guided implant placement using closed and open sleeves was comparable when the sleeve-bone distance was 2 mm. Accuracy decreased when the sleeve-bone distance increased in both fully guided groups, more so in the open than in the closed sleeve group. The least accurate method was the free-hand group. Partially guided implant surgery was more accurate than free-hand placement, but less accurate than the fully guided groups with 2-mm sleeve-bone distance.
conclusionsThe closer the sleeve to the bone, the more accurate and precise is computer-assisted implant surgery using a closed system and a system using open sleeves. Partially guided implant surgery using only the static guide for the pilot drill is less accurate than both fully guided approaches, but more accurate than free-hand surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.