Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148440›Full record

SynthesisNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2022

Intravenous vitamin C use and risk of severity and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Guangyu Ao, Jing Li, Yang Yuan, Yushu Wang, Basma Nasr, Mulong Bao, Ming Gao, Xin Qi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Intravenous vitamin C use and risk of severity and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guangyu AoDepartment of Nephrology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Nephrology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yang YuanDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery-Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Thoracic Surgery, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Yushu WangChengdu West China Clinical Research Center CO, Ltd, Sichuan, China.
Basma NasrDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Mulong BaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ming GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xin QiDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University & The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5874-7321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The administration of intravenous vitamin C (IV-VC) in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still highly controversial. There have been no previous studies on the effect of IV-VC on the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 who promptly received IV-VC treatment vs those who did not. We performed a comprehensive systematic search of seven health science databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, up to June 23, 2021. We identified a total of seven related articles, which were included in this study. This meta-analysis showed that IV-VC treatment did not affect disease severity compared with placebo treatment or usual care (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.07; P = 0.10). In addition, no statistically significant difference in mortality was observed between patients who received IV-VC treatment and those who did not (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.00; P = 0.05). Moreover, the adjusted meta-analysis revealed that the use of IV-VC did not influence disease severity (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.31; P = 0.242) or mortality (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.40; P = 0.877) in comparison with a control group. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that short-term IV-VC treatment did not reduce the risk of severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAscorbic AcidChinaHumansSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexAscorbic AcidCOVID-19critical illnessdisease severitymeta-analysismortalitySARS-CoV-2vitamin C

Identifiers

PMID35148440
PMCPMC9088481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.