Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35148379›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

NCAM1 and GDF15 are biomarkers of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in patients and mice.

Matthew J Jennings, Alexia Kagiava, Leen Vendredy, Emily L Spaulding, Marina Stavrou, Denisa Hathazi, Anika Grüneboom, Vicky De Winter, Burkhard Gess, Ulrike Schara and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The neuropathy-causingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Matthew J JenningsDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3903-1299
Alexia KagiavaDepartment of Neuroscience and Neuromuscular Disorders Centre, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Leen VendredyPeripheral Neuropathy Research Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute Born Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Emily L SpauldingThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Marina StavrouDepartment of Neuroscience and Neuromuscular Disorders Centre, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-6523
Denisa HathaziDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anika GrüneboomLeibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften-ISAS-e.V, Dortmund, Germany.
Vicky De WinterPeripheral Neuropathy Research Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute Born Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Burkhard GessDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ulrike ScharaCentre for Neuromuscular Disorders in Children, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Oksana PogoryelovaDirectorate of Neurosciences, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Hanns LochmüllerDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Brain and Mind Research Institute and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Christoph H BorchersSegal Cancer Proteomics Centre, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-6512
Andreas RoosDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Brain and Mind Research Institute and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Robert W BurgessThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Vincent TimmermanPeripheral Neuropathy Research Group, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute Born Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-0933
Kleopas A KleopaDepartment of Neuroscience and Neuromuscular Disorders Centre, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-4103-8094
Rita HorvathDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-170X
Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics · CYUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Cambridge · GBJackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Ottawa · CALeibniz Institute for Analytical Sciences - ISAS · DERoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RUUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

The Genetics of the Neuromuscular Junction: Mechanisms and Disease ModelsR37NS054154 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Robert W. Burgess · 2020 to 2026
$5.9M
Transcriptional and Translational Profiling of Motor Neurons in Two Mouse Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 2DF31NS100328 · NINDS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SPAULDING, EMILY LOUISA · 2017 to 2019
$87k
European Research Council 309548Medical Research Council MR/N025431/1Medical Research Council MR/V009346/1NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS100328NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS054154Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular markers scalable for clinical use are critical for the development of effective treatments and the design of clinical trials. Here, we identify proteins in sera of patients and mouse models with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) with characteristics that make them suitable as biomarkers in clinical practice and therapeutic trials. We collected serum from mouse models of CMT1A (C61 het), CMT2D (GarsC201R, GarsP278KY), CMT1X (Gjb1-null), CMT2L (Hspb8K141N) and from CMT patients with genotypes including CMT1A (PMP22d), CMT2D (GARS), CMT2N (AARS) and other rare genetic forms of CMT. The severity of neuropathy in the patients was assessed by the CMT Neuropathy Examination Score (CMTES). We performed multitargeted proteomics on both sample sets to identify proteins elevated across multiple mouse models and CMT patients. Selected proteins and additional potential biomarkers, such as growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and cell free mitochondrial DNA, were validated by ELISA and quantitative PCR, respectively. We propose that neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1) is a candidate biomarker for CMT, as it was elevated in Gjb1-null, Hspb8K141N, GarsC201R and GarsP278KY mice as well as in patients with both demyelinating (CMT1A) and axonal (CMT2D, CMT2N) forms of CMT. We show that NCAM1 may reflect disease severity, demonstrated by a progressive increase in mouse models with time and a significant positive correlation with CMTES neuropathy severity in patients. The increase in NCAM1 may reflect muscle regeneration triggered by denervation, which could potentially track disease progression or the effect of treatments. We found that member proteins of the complement system were elevated in Gjb1-null and Hspb8K141N mouse models as well as in patients with both demyelinating and axonal CMT, indicating possible complement activation at the impaired nerve terminals. However, complement proteins did not correlate with the severity of neuropathy measured on the CMTES scale. Although the complement system does not seem to be a prognostic biomarker, we do show complement elevation to be a common disease feature of CMT, which may be of interest as a therapeutic target. We also identify serum GDF15 as a highly sensitive diagnostic biomarker, which was elevated in all CMT genotypes as well as in Hspb8K141N, Gjb1-null, GarsC201R and GarsP278KY mouse models. Although we cannot fully explain its origin, it may reflect increased stress response or metabolic disturbances in CMT. Further large and longitudinal patient studies should be performed to establish the value of these proteins as diagnostic and prognostic molecular biomarkers for CMT.

Indexed as

CD56 AntigenCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseGrowth Differentiation Factor 15Alanine-tRNA LigaseAnimalsBiomarkersHumansMiceProteinsAlanine-tRNA LigaseBiomarkersCD56 AntigenGDF15 protein, humanGdf15 protein, mouseGrowth Differentiation Factor 15NCAM1 protein, humanNcam1 protein, mouseProteinsbiomarkerCharcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT)mouse modelsserumtranslational‌

Identifiers

PMID35148379
PMCPMC9679171
OpenAlexW4210875960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.