Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147895›Full record

ArticleAnnals of dyslexia2022

Global reading processes in children with high risk of dyslexia: a scanpath analysis.

Olga Parshina, Anastasiya Lopukhina, Sofya Goldina, Ekaterina Iskra, Margarita Serebryakova, Vladislava Loshchinina, Nina Zdorova, Olga Dragoy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of dyslexia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga ParshinaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000. oparshina@hse.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-4961
Anastasiya LopukhinaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
Sofya GoldinaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
Ekaterina IskraCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
Margarita SerebryakovaCenter for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia.
Vladislava LoshchininaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
Nina ZdorovaCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
Olga DragoyCenter for Language and Brain, HSE University, 3 Krivokolennyy Pereulok, Room 311, Moscow, Russia, 101000.
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RUCenter for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study presents the first systematic comparison of the global reading processes via scanpath analysis in Russian-speaking children with and without reading difficulties. First, we compared basic eye-movement characteristics in reading sentences in two groups of children in grades 1 to 5 (N = 72 in high risk of developmental dyslexia group and N = 72 in the control group). Next, using the scanpath method, we investigated which global reading processes these children adopt to read the entire sentence and how these processes differ between the groups. Finally, we were interested in the timeframe of the change in the global reading processes from the 1st to the 5th grades for both groups. We found that the main difference in word-level measures between groups was the reading speed reflected in fixation durations. However, the examination of the five identified global reading processes revealed qualitative similarities in reading patterns between groups. Children in the control group progressed quickly and by the 4th grade engaged in an adult-like fluent reading process. The high-risk group started with the beginner reading process, then similar to first graders in the control group, engaged mostly in the intermediate and upper-intermediate reading processes in 2nd to 4th grades. They reach the advanced process in the 5th grade, the same pattern preferred by the control group second graders. Overall, the scanpath analysis reveals that although there are quantitative differences in the word-level eye-tracking measures between groups, qualitatively children in the high-risk group read on par with typically developing peers but with a 3-year reading delay.

Indexed as

DyslexiaReadingAdultChildCognitionEye MovementsHumansLanguageChildrenDevelopmental dyslexiaEye-trackingReadingRussianScanpaths

Identifiers

PMID35147895
PMCPMC8853123
OpenAlexW4211006708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.