Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147842›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic ring and acetabulum: an anatomical feasibility study.

Markus A Küper, Alexander Trulson, Jonas Johannink, Bernhard Hirt, Artur Leis, Max Hoßfeld, Tina Histing, Steven C Herath, Bastian Amend

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plating of the Pelvis and Acetabulum via the Laparoscopic Technique: An Alternative Method for ORIF.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Feasibility study of a robot-assisted endoscopic technique for plate osteosyntheses of the acetabulum and anterior pelvic ring.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Markus A Küper *Department for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. mkueper@bgu-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-7993
Alexander Trulson *Department for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Surgery, BG Trauma Center, Murnau am Staffelsee, Germany.
Jonas JohanninkDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard HirtInstitute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Artur LeisInstitut für Strahlwerkzeuge (IFSW), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Max HoßfeldInstitut für Strahlwerkzeuge (IFSW), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Tina HistingDepartment for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Steven C HerathDepartment for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Bastian AmendDepartment for Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic ring injuries or acetabular fractures present a challenge to trauma surgeons. Recently, endoscopic dissection techniques for visualization of the anterior pelvic ring and acetabulum have been presented. Robotic-assisted surgical systems offer advantages in terms of improved visualization and easier instrument handling. The aim of this pilot anatomic study was to verify the feasibility of robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis on the anterior pelvic ring and acetabulum. The experiment was performed on a human whole body specimen. The DaVinci system with standard instruments as used in RARP was used. After docking the system, the anterior pelvic ring was first prepared as previously described for the endoscopic techniques. This was followed by dissection of both acetabula analogous to pelvic lymphadenectomy as performed during RARP. After the dissection was performed along the pelvic brim up to the iliosacral joint, the complete anterior column of the acetabulum including quadrilateral surface and incisura ischiadica major could be visualized. Finally, robotic-assisted endoscopic plate osteosynthesis was performed on the symphysis and anterior acetabular column as previously described in the endoscopic techniques. Robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic ring and acetabulum is feasible with the available robotic-assisted systems. Due to the excellent freedom of movement of the robotic arms, combined with the magnifying 3D visualization of the system, highly accurate preparation of the situs in preparation for plate osteosynthesis can be performed. The question of reduction of dislocated fractures remains open and is the subject of further investigation. Compared with conventional laparoscopy, robotic-assisted preparation nevertheless appears to offer an advantage in view of the complexity of the operation.

Indexed as

AcetabulumRobotic Surgical ProceduresBone PlatesFeasibility StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansAcetabular surgeryEASYEndoscopic surgeryLASYMinimally invasive surgeryPelvic ring injury

Identifiers

PMID35147842
OpenAlexW4211203337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.