Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147824›Full record

ReviewArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis2022

Treat-to-Target in Lupus Nephritis. What is the Role of the Repeat Kidney Biopsy?

Ioannis Parodis, Farah Tamirou, Frédéric A Houssiau

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Lupus Nephritis: Unmet Needs and Evolving Solutions.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Review
  8. Lupus nephritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis ParodisDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. ioannis.parodis@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-5395
Farah TamirouPôle de Pathologies Rhumatismales Inflammatoires et Systémiques, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Frédéric A HoussiauPôle de Pathologies Rhumatismales Inflammatoires et Systémiques, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1451-083X
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney involvement, termed lupus nephritis (LN), develops in 35-60% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, often early during the disease course. When not treated promptly and efficiently, LN may lead to rapid and severe loss of kidney function, being the reason why it is considered one of the most severe lupus manifestations. Despite improved pharmacotherapy, 5-20% of LN patients develop end-stage kidney disease within ten years from the LN diagnosis. While the principal ground of LN therapy is prevention of renal function worsening, resembling a race against nephron loss, consensual agreement upon outcome measures and clinically meaningful short- and long-term targets of LN therapy have yet to be determined. Literature points to the importance of inclusion of tissue-based approaches in the determination of those targets, and evidence accumulates regarding the importance of per-protocol repeat kidney biopsies in the evaluation of the initial phase of therapy and prediction of long-term renal prognosis. The latter leads to the hypothesis that the information gleaned from repeat biopsies may contribute to optimised therapeutic decision making, and, therefore, increased probability to attain complete renal response in the short term, and a more favourable renal prognosis within a longer prospect. The multinational project ReBioLup was recently designed to serve as a key contributor to form evidence about the role of per-protocol repeat biopsies in a randomised fashion and aspires to unify the global LN community towards improved kidney and patient survival.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisBiopsyHumansKidneyRetrospective StudiesAutoimmunityKidney biopsyKidney disordersLupus nephritisSystemic lupus erythematosusTreat-to-target

Identifiers

PMID35147824
PMCPMC8837511
OpenAlexW4211002342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.