Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147766›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

Artificial intelligence for the detection, prediction, and management of atrial fibrillation.

Jonas L Isaksen, Mathias Baumert, Astrid N L Hermans, Molly Maleckar, Dominik Linz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06001528 (Serum and Tissue Metabolite-based Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06001528 recruitingnot on this map

Serum and Tissue Metabolite-based Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorShantou Central HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled2,400ConditionsBreast Cancer, Lymph Node Metastasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating artificial intelligence-enabled medical tests in cardiology: Best practice.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Digital competence in rhythmology : Training and education].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  13. Longer and better lives for patients with atrial fibrillation: the 9th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Accuracy of continuous photoplethysmography-based 1 min mean heart rate assessment during atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. New concepts in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas L IsaksenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mathias BaumertSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Astrid N L HermansDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Molly MaleckarDepartment of Computational Physiology, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. dominik.linz@gmx.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article reviews the state of the art of machine learning algorithms for the detection, prediction, and management of atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as of the development and evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiology and beyond. Today, AI detects AF with a high accuracy using 12-lead or single-lead electrocardiograms or photoplethysmography. The prediction of paroxysmal or future AF currently operates at a level of precision that is too low for clinical use. Further studies are needed to determine whether patient selection for interventions may be possible with machine learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAtrial FibrillationAlgorithmsElectrocardiographyHumansMachine LearningAFAIDeep learningDisease managementMachine learningNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID35147766
PMCPMC8853037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.