ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Long-term follow-up of respiratory function in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Assessing respiratory status in myasthenia gravis: limited value of the MG-ADL as a standalone tool compared with spirometry in a Danish cohort.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Association of Diaphragm Involvement Assessed by Ultrasound With Disease Severity in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Observational
- Respiratory function and evaluation in individuals with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy in the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research Network.Neuromuscular disorders : NMD · 2025Article
- Sternal Reconstruction for Refractory Pectus Excavatum From Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024Article
- Gene Editing to Tackle Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the 5-year change in respiratory function in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
methodsGenetically confirmed patients with FSHD aged ≥ 18 years were examined twice over five years. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured using hand-held spirometry with a face mask. Several clinical outcome measures were correlated to respiratory function.
resultsNinety-two patients were included (57% male, age 18-75 years). At baseline, the spirometry outcomes of 41 patients showed a restrictive ventilatory pattern (FVC < 80% and FEV1/FVC ≥ 70% of predicted) and of 48 patients at follow-up. The mean FVC decreased from baseline to follow-up from 79.0 to 76.7% predicted (p = 0.021). This decrease was driven by a subgroup of 15 patients who had a deterioration of FVC of > 10% predicted. The subgroup of 15 patients was more severely affected at baseline (p = 0.002 for FSHD clinical score and 0.007 for Ricci score). They developed more frequently spinal and thorax deformities (p < 0.001 for kyphoscoliosis and 0.012 for pectus excavatum) and had a larger decline in axial muscle function (p = 0.020). Only weak correlations were found between the change in FVC% predicted and the change in clinical scores between baseline and follow-up.
interpretationRespiratory function remained stable in most patients with FSHD, but a subgroup of patients showed a pronounced deterioration. They showed more severe muscle weakness including the leg muscles at baseline (Ricci score ≥ 6), had spinal and thorax deformities and a relatively fast decline in axial muscle function at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.