Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147714›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2022

Machine learning to identify distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesions of infant abuse: a pilot study.

Andy Tsai, Paul K Kleinman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Identifying Risk Factors of Children Who Suffered Physical Abuse: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development, contributions, and future directions of a multicenter child abuse research network.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andy TsaiDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. andy.tsai@childrens.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0089-6463
Paul K KleinmanDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is an injury that is highly specific for infant abuse, and the distal tibia is one of the most common sites of occurrence. A machine learning tool that identifies distal tibial CMLs on infant skeletal surveys could assist radiologists in the diagnosis of infant abuse.

objectiveTo develop and evaluate a machine learning-based classification algorithm to identify distal tibial CMLs on skeletal surveys performed for suspected infant abuse. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed medical records of infants (≤1 year old) who had skeletal surveys for suspected abuse at a large tertiary children's hospital over the past 13 years to identify those at low and high risk for abuse. Normal distal tibial radiographs from the low-risk group formed the normal study cohort; radiographs with distal tibial CMLs from the high-risk group formed the abnormal study cohort. We used these two cohorts to train a machine learning algorithm to classify distal tibial radiographs as normal or abnormal. We systematically evaluated this algorithm using a fivefold cross-validation procedure and statistically analyzed the results.

resultsThe normal study cohort consisted of 177 radiographs from 89 infants, and the abnormal study cohort consisted of 73 radiographs from 35 infants. Our machine learning algorithm showed an overall performance accuracy of 93% and Kappa of 0.84. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the model were 88% and 96%, respectively.

conclusionOur developed machine learning model shows encouraging results as an automated tool to identify CMLs of the distal tibia on skeletal surveys performed for suspected infant abuse.

Indexed as

Child AbuseTibial FracturesHumansInfantMachine LearningPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesTibiaChild abuseChildrenClassic metaphyseal lesionFractureMachine learningMetaphysisRadiographySkeletal survey

Identifiers

PMID35147714
OpenAlexW4211024373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.