ArticleAnesthesiology2022
Personalized Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning to Guide Preoperative Type and Screen Orders.
Article in Anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07223853 (Intelligent Clinical Decision Support for Preoperative Blood Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intelligent Clinical Decision Support for Preoperative Blood Management: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Intraoperative Telemedicine Program to Improve Perioperative Quality Measures: The ACTFAST-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for Intraoperative Bleeding Prediction in Patients Undergoing Surgery: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Real-time, artificial intelligence-guided intraoperative resuscitation and fluid management in trauma anesthesia.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Routine Group-and-Save (G+S) Testing Prior to Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A 10-Year Single-Centre Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Emerging Technology and the Future of Perioperative Care: Perspectives and Recommendations From the 2023 Stoelting Conference of the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2025Review
- Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Surgical Transfusion Risk at 45 US Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Is Routine Group and Save Sampling Necessary for Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy?Cureus · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a perioperative blood transfusion model for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning to predict postoperative ileus after radical cystectomy: an 11-year real-world cohort.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Challenges in reliable preoperative blood ordering: A qualitative interview study.Transfusion · 2024Article
- Machine learning in transfusion medicine: A scoping review.Transfusion · 2024Article
- Development of a machine learning model to predict intraoperative transfusion and guide type and screen ordering.Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2023Article
- A model based on electronic health records to predict transfusion events in on-pump cardiac surgery.iScience · 2023Article
- On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology.Current anesthesiology reports · 2023Article
- Predictive modeling of perioperative blood transfusion in lumbar posterior interbody fusion using machine learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Personalized Surgical Transfusion Risk Prediction: Comment.Anesthesiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate estimation of surgical transfusion risk is essential for efficient allocation of blood bank resources and for other aspects of anesthetic planning. This study hypothesized that a machine learning model incorporating both surgery- and patient-specific variables would outperform the traditional approach that uses only procedure-specific information, allowing for more efficient allocation of preoperative type and screen orders.
methodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File was used to train four machine learning models to predict the likelihood of red cell transfusion using surgery-specific and patient-specific variables. A baseline model using only procedure-specific information was created for comparison. The models were trained on surgical encounters that occurred at 722 hospitals in 2016 through 2018. The models were internally validated on surgical cases that occurred at 719 hospitals in 2019. Generalizability of the best-performing model was assessed by external validation on surgical cases occurring at a single institution in 2020.
resultsTransfusion prevalence was 2.4% (73,313 of 3,049,617), 2.2% (23,205 of 1,076,441), and 6.7% (1,104 of 16,053) across the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The gradient boosting machine outperformed the baseline model and was the best- performing model. At a fixed 96% sensitivity, this model had a positive predictive value of 0.06 and 0.21 and recommended type and screens for 36% and 30% of the patients in internal and external validation, respectively. By comparison, the baseline model at the same sensitivity had a positive predictive value of 0.04 and 0.144 and recommended type and screens for 57% and 45% of the patients in internal and external validation, respectively. The most important predictor variables were overall procedure-specific transfusion rate and preoperative hematocrit.
conclusionsA personalized transfusion risk prediction model was created using both surgery- and patient-specific variables to guide preoperative type and screen orders and showed better performance compared to the traditional procedure-centric approach. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.