ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022
Analyzing Effect of Waterclefts on Visual Functions Via Optical Simulations.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amniotic Membrane Stromal Cells Facilitate Corneal Epithelial Tissue Engineering by Promoting Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Expansion.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Impact of watercleft localization on higher-order aberrations and visual function.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the impact of the size and location of waterclefts (WC), which are one of several cataract subtypes, on visual function by optical simulation analysis. Methods: An optical simulation software (CODE V) was used to develop a schematic eye model and several sizes of WC central and peripheral types that were located below the anterior and posterior subcapsules of the crystalline lens, and analyses of refraction, higher-order aberrations (HOA), and the modulation transfer function (MTF) were performed. Results: An increase in the WC size increased the refraction and HOA and decreased the MTF. The impact of the WC below the posterior subcapsule on the visual function was more enhanced than that below the anterior subcapsule. Large WC demonstrated a remarkable hyperopic shift in refractive power as well as an increase in HOA. The MTF decreased slightly with increasing WC size at a spatial frequency of 20 cycles/mm, and it decreased remarkably at 60 cycles/mm. Conclusions: The impact on the visual function increased with increasing WC size. It was revealed that eyes with WC below the posterior subcapsule are more hyperopic than those with WC below the anterior subcapsule, and the former have a higher HOA and lower MTF than the latter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.