ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022
The Roles Played by FP/EP3 Receptors During Pressure-lowering in Mouse Eyes Mediated by a Dual FP/EP3 Receptor Agonist.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term safety and efficacy of sepetaprost, with or without timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from the randomised, phase 3 ANGEL-J2 study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of sepetaprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from the randomised, phase 3 ANGEL-J1 study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Trial
- The role of prostanoids in the retina and optic nerve in health and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Ocular surface disease: a known yet overlooked side effect of topical glaucoma therapy.Frontiers in toxicology · 2023Review
- Current situation and progress of drugs for reducing intraocular pressure.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of topical sepetaprost (SPT), a dual agonist of the FP and EP3 receptors. We explored whether certain receptors mediated the hypotensive effect of SPT and outflow facility changes in C57BL/6 mice (wild-type [WT]) and FP and EP3 receptor-deficient mice (FPKO and EP3KO mice, respectively). Methods: IOP was measured using a microneedle. Outflow facility was measured using a two-level, constant-pressure perfusion method. Results: SPT significantly reduced IOP for 8 hours after administration to WT mice. The 2-hour IOP reductions afforded by latanoprost were 15.3 ± 2.5, 1.8 ± 2.0, and 12.3 ± 2.4% in WT, FPKO, and EP3KO mice, respectively; the SPT figures were 13.6 ± 2.1, 5.9 ± 2.7, and 6.6 ± 2.6%, respectively. Latanoprost-mediated IOP reduction was significantly decreased in FPKO mice, and SPT-mediated IOP reduction was reduced in both FPKO and EP3KO mice. At 6 hours after administration, latanoprost did not significantly reduce the IOP in any tested mouse strain. SPT-mediated IOP reduction was reduced in both FPKO and EP3KO mice. IOP reduction at 6 hours was significantly higher after simultaneous administration of selective FP and EP3 receptor agonists, but IOP did not fall on administration of (only) a selective EP3 receptor agonist. SPT significantly increased outflow facility in WT mice, but less so in FPKO and EP3KO mice. Conclusions: The IOP-lowering effect of SPT lasted longer than that of latanoprost. Our data imply that this may be attributable to augmented outflow facility mediated by the FP and EP3 receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.