Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147507›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

In Search of State and Trait Emotion Markers in Mobile-Sensed Language: Field Study.

Chiara Carlier, Koen Niemeijer, Merijn Mestdagh, Michael Bauwens, Peter Vanbrabant, Luc Geurts, Toon van Waterschoot, Peter Kuppens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chiara CarlierDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-6240
Koen NiemeijerDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-534X
Merijn MestdaghDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5077-861X
Michael BauwensDepartment of Smart Organisations, University College Leuven-Limburg, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-7516
Peter VanbrabantDepartment of Smart Organisations, University College Leuven-Limburg, Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0217-3303
Luc GeurtsDepartment of Computer Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9608-9147
Toon van WaterschootDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6323-7350
Peter KuppensDepartment of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-2356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotions and mood are important for overall well-being. Therefore, the search for continuous, effortless emotion prediction methods is an important field of study. Mobile sensing provides a promising tool and can capture one of the most telling signs of emotion: language.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the separate and combined predictive value of mobile-sensed language data sources for detecting both momentary emotional experience as well as global individual differences in emotional traits and depression.

methodsIn a 2-week experience sampling method study, we collected self-reported emotion ratings and voice recordings 10 times a day, continuous keyboard activity, and trait depression severity. We correlated state and trait emotions and depression and language, distinguishing between speech content (spoken words), speech form (voice acoustics), writing content (written words), and writing form (typing dynamics). We also investigated how well these features predicted state and trait emotions using cross-validation to select features and a hold-out set for validation.

resultsOverall, the reported emotions and mobile-sensed language demonstrated weak correlations. The most significant correlations were found between speech content and state emotions and between speech form and state emotions, ranging up to 0.25. Speech content provided the best predictions for state emotions. None of the trait emotion-language correlations remained significant after correction. Among the emotions studied, valence and happiness displayed the most significant correlations and the highest predictive performance.

conclusionsAlthough using mobile-sensed language as an emotion marker shows some promise, correlations and predictive R

Indexed as

depressionemotionslanguageLIWCmobile phonemobile sensingopenSMILEspeechwriting

Identifiers

PMID35147507
PMCPMC8881775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.