Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147463›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2022

Enhancing HIV Self-Testing Among Nigerian Youth: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of the 4 Youth by Youth Study Using Crowdsourced Youth-Led Strategies.

Juliet Iwelunmor, Oliver Ezechi, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Titilola Gbaja-Biamila, Adesola Z Musa, Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Hong Xian, David Oladele, Collins O Airhihenbuwa, Kathryn Muessig and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Juliet IwelunmorCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-5443
Oliver EzechiClinical Sciences Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Chisom Obiezu-UmehCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-9313
Titilola Gbaja-BiamilaCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Adesola Z MusaClinical Sciences Department, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ucheoma NwaozuruDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Hong XianCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
David OladeleCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Collins O AirhihenbuwaHeath Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kathryn MuessigGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Nora RosenbergGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Donaldson F ConserveDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jason J OngCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan NkengasongClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Suzanne DayDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kadija M TahlilGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Rhonda BeLueCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stacey MasonCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Weiming TangDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Gbenga OgedegbeCenter for Healthful Behavior Change, Division of Health and Behavior, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Joseph D TuckerDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Saint Louis University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNigerian Institute of Medical Research · NGCenter for Health and Learning · USGeorgia State University · USMilken Institute · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

ITEST: Innovative Tools to Expand Youth-Friendly HIV Self-TestingUG3HD096929 · NICHD · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI EZECHI, OLIVER CHUKWUJEKWU, IWELUNMOR, JULIET · 2018 to 2019
$2.3M
Mentoring Multidisciplinary Global HIV Patient-Oriented ResearchK24AI143471 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Joseph David Tucker · 2019 to 2026
$1.4M
Developing and Assessing a Male Engagement Intervention for Option B+ in MalawiR00MH104154 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROSENBERG, NORA · 2017 to 2019
$746k
Development of an HIV Self-testing Intervention to Reduce HIV risks among MSM: Taking the Guess Out of SeroguessingR34MH109359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WEI, CHONGYI · 2016 to 2018
$726k
Enhancing Partner Services among Men Who Have Sex with Men Living With HIV: A Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialR34MH119963 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TANG, WEIMING, TUCKER, JOSEPH DAVID · 2019 to 2021
$568k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143471NICHD NIH HHS UG3 HD096929NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH104154NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH109359NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH119963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although HIV self-testing (HIVST) has expanded in many regions, a few HIVST services have been tailored for and organized by youth. Innovative HIVST models are needed to differentiate testing services and generate local demand for HIVST among youth. The current pilot study aimed at examining the feasibility and efficacy of crowdsourced youth-led strategies to enhance HIVST as well as sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing. Teams of youth iteratively developed HIVST interventions using crowdsourcing approaches and apprenticeship training. Five interventions were selected and then evaluated among youth (ages 14-24) from September 2019 to March 2020. Given the similar outcomes and approaches, we present cumulative data from the completed interventions. We assessed HIVST uptake (self-report), STI uptake (facility reports for gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis B, and chlamydia testing), and quality of youth participation. Mixed-effect logistic regression models estimated intervention effects at baseline and 6 months. Of the 388 youths enrolled, 25.3% were aged 14-19, 58.0% were male, and 54.1% had completed secondary education. We observed a significant increase in HIVST from 3 months compared with 6 months (20% vs. 90%;

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingGonorrheaHepatitis BHIV InfectionsSexually Transmitted DiseasesSyphilisAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaPilot ProjectsSelf-TestingcrowdsourcingHIVNigeriaself-testingsexually transmitted infectionyouth

Identifiers

PMID35147463
PMCPMC8861905
OpenAlexW4211006603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.