Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35147456›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Trends in Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Two Subtypes of Primary Liver Cancers: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Based Population Study.

Jiping Yao, Xue Liang, Yanning Liu, Shuangshuang Li, Min Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Assessment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with LI-RADS in the high-risk population: MRI diagnosis and postoperative survival.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic alterations ofOpen life sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiping YaoState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xue LiangState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yanning LiuState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Shuangshuang LiState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Min ZhengState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-9879
National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of our study was to investigate and compare the epidemiologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients.

methodsAge-adjusted incidence rates were evaluated from 1975 to 2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors for OS.

resultsIn the last 10 years, the incidence rate of ICC increased rapidly by 109% (annual percentage change (APC) = 8.24, 95% CI = 6.64 to 9.86;

conclusionIn the last 10 years, the incidence of HCC had a slow growth in the United States, whereas ICC showed a remarkable increase. The 5-year OS of the former has improved in recent years while that of the latter showed no significant improvement. Therefore, surgery could contribute to superior survival outcomes as compared to other treatments.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHumansIncidenceMalePrognosisSEER ProgramUnited Stateshepatocellular carcinomaincidenceintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomapredictionprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35147456
PMCPMC8841928
OpenAlexW4211030020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.