ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
Avalanche criticality in individuals, fluid intelligence, and working memory.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is criticality a unified setpoint of brain function?Neuron · 2025Pooled it
- Critical neuronal avalanches arise from excitation-inhibition balanced spontaneous activity.iScience · 2026Article
- Aberrant recovery of timescale-aligned amplitude balance links to symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Critical Dynamics in the Association Cortex Predict Higher Intelligence in Typically Developing Children.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Aberrant Recovery of Timescale-Aligned Amplitude Balance Links to Symptoms and Cognition in Schizophrenia.Research square · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal brain complexity quantifies consciousness outside of perturbation paradigms.eLife · 2025Article
- Resting-State Functional MRI Analyses for Brain Activity Characterization: A Narrative Review of Features and Methods.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
- Neural flexibility in metabolic demand dynamics reveals sex-specific differences and supports cognition in late childhood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Timescale-normalized fMRI reveals disrupted dynamic signal-energy balance in schizophrenia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genetic contributions to brain criticality and its relationship with human cognitive functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Intersection of Brain Complexity, Functional Connectivity, and Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Imitating and exploring the human brain's resting and task-performing states via brain computing: scaling and architecture.National science review · 2024Article
- Local signal variability and functional connectivity: Sensitive measures of the excitation-inhibition ratio?Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Brain criticality predicts individual levels of inter-areal synchronization in human electrophysiological data.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A systematic approach to brain dynamics: cognitive evolution theory of consciousness.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Investigating cognitive neuroscience theories of human intelligence: A connectome-based predictive modeling approach.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Avalanche criticality in individuals, fluid intelligence, and working memory.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Criticality is Associated with Future Psychotherapy Response in Patients with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-A Pilot Study.Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The critical brain hypothesis suggests that efficient neural computation can be achieved through critical brain dynamics. However, the relationship between human cognitive performance and scale-free brain dynamics remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the whole-brain avalanche activity and its individual variability in the human resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. We showed that though the group-level analysis was inaccurate because of individual variability, the subject wise scale-free avalanche activity was significantly associated with maximal synchronization entropy of their brain activity. Meanwhile, the complexity of functional connectivity, as well as structure-function coupling, is maximized in subjects with maximal synchronization entropy. We also observed order-disorder phase transitions in resting-state brain dynamics and found that there were longer times spent in the subcritical regime. These results imply that large-scale brain dynamics favor the slightly subcritical regime of phase transition. Finally, we showed evidence that the neural dynamics of human participants with higher fluid intelligence and working memory scores are closer to criticality. We identified brain regions whose critical dynamics showed significant positive correlations with fluid intelligence performance and found that these regions were located in the prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex, which were believed to be important nodes of brain networks underlying human intelligence. Our results reveal the possible role that avalanche criticality plays in cognitive performance and provide a simple method to identify the critical point and map cortical states on a spectrum of neural dynamics, ranging from subcriticality to supercriticality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.