Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146817›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2023

A scoping review of clinical skill development of preregistration registered nurses in Australia and five other English-speaking countries.

Jane Currie, Cristina Thompson, Pam Grootemaat, Patrea Andersen, Alan Finnegan, Michael Carter, Elizabeth Halcomb

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novice nurses' professional competence: A qualitative content analysis.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jane CurrieQueensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-089X
Cristina ThompsonCentre for Health Service Development, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4369-0940
Pam GrootemaatCentre for Health Service Development, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrea AndersenCentre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Alan FinneganUniversity of Chester, Riverside Campus, Chester, UK.
Michael CarterUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth HalcombSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8099-986X

Funding

Department of Health, Australian Government RFx2081-SON 351 9128Queensland University of Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this scoping review is to synthesise current evidence around the clinical skill development of preregistration registered nurses (RNs) in Australia, United Kingdom (UK), Ireland, United States (US), Canada and New Zealand, to inform nurse education, policy and clinical practice.

backgroundNursing is a practical profession, and registered nurses require specific skills, knowledge and attributes in order to care for patients safely. The context for health care delivery is shifting, and the education of nurses must adapt to effectively equip the registered nurse of the future.

designA scoping review was conducted of clinical skill development in preregistration nurses. CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, Health Source (Nursing/Academic edition) and Scopus were searched. Included studies were primary Australian studies and international literature reviews, which focussed on preregistration nursing education. Papers were written in the English language and focussed on clinical skill development. Results were synthesised narratively. The review is reported here in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Scoping Review extension (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

resultsOne hundred fifty-five Australia studies and 89 international reviews were included in the review. Six key themes were identified, namely clinical skills, approaches to teaching and learning, interprofessional education, assessment of learning, clinical placement and simulation.

conclusionThere is substantial variation in strategies and programmes to facilitate clinical skill development both within Australia and internationally, indicating a genuine shift away from traditional didactic pedagogy. New graduate registered nurses were expected to be "work-ready," albeit at a novice level, when they enter the workplace. Future research should consider measures of impact on actual clinical practice and focus on developing work-ready graduates for the range of clinical settings in which they may practice. Educators, policymakers and educational institutions can use these findings to inform curriculum developments to ensure that clinical skill development is evidence-based.

Indexed as

Education, NursingNursesAustraliaClinical CompetenceHumansLanguageclinical placementsclinical skillsinterprofessional learningnursing educationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID35146817
PMCPMC10078692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.