Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35146780›Full record

ReviewPharmacotherapy2022

Efficacy of inactivated vaccines in patients treated with immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Nina M Bemben, Melody L Berg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vaccinations in patients with interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina M BembenWolters Kluwer Clinical Effectiveness, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8798-7570
Melody L BergAmerican Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · USWolters Kluwer (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivated vaccines are generally considered safe in immunocompromised patients but the ability of immunocompromised patients to generate an effective immune response to vaccines is uncertain. Although recent reviews have focused on the effects of vaccines in patients who are immunocompromised due to various disease states (primary immunodeficiency), the effects of immunosuppressive drug therapy (secondary immunodeficiency) has received relatively less attention. This review evaluates evidence regarding the efficacy of inactivated vaccines against influenza, COVID-19, and other diseases in patients treated with immunosuppressive oncologic agents, immunosuppressants used for transplant recipients, and immunosuppressants used for autoimmune disorders. Although evidence is mixed for many immunosuppressive agents and vaccines, most studies have found an attenuated immune response to inactivated vaccines, with the majority of data indicate anti-B-cell antibodies have a more severe and prolonged negative effect on vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentInfluenza VaccinesHumansImmunocompromised HostImmunosuppression TherapyImmunosuppressive AgentsVaccines, InactivatedImmunosuppressive AgentsInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedantirheumatic agentsimmunosuppressive agentsinactivated vaccinevaccine

Identifiers

PMID35146780
PMCPMC9088666
OpenAlexW4211237745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.